I have spoken to J.D. Hayworth about this a few years ago. He feels the same way.
I would be curious for a "clarification" on what it is that he feels the same way about. There are two different ways of understanding your statement.
One way says that a state can (and has the legal ability to) deprive a kid who is born in that state of being a U.S. Citizen, if his parents are not citizens. Those are called "anchor babies"... the parents either being legal or illegals, in the United States at the time.
The second way of understanding what you just said, is that he believes that we should not have the situation where there can be "anchor babies" legally speaking, and that we need to changed that in our laws (namely Congress needs to change that).
I don't know which one of the two you are talking about. And I consider the difference between the two to be a sign of whether someone is "attached to reality" or not ... LOL ...
He was all for getting rid of the anchor baby ruling at the time I spoke to him. He was my representative at the time and said that he would look into it.