Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Paul: We Wouldn't Need Laws If Everyone Were Christian (extreme Paul Derangement Syndrome)
ReligionDispatches.Org ^ | May 21, 2010 | Sarah Posner

Posted on 05/22/2010 7:12:43 AM PDT by Christian_Capitalist

May 21, 2010
8:02AM
Rand Paul: We Wouldn't Need Laws If Everyone Were Christian
Post by Sarah Posner

Appearing on The Brody File, Rand Paul, who believes that portions of the 1964 Civil Rights Act need "further discussion" and may violate private business owners' First Amendment rights, said that we wouldn't really need laws in this country if everyone were a good Christian:

Although Paul attends a mainline Protestant church, in his comments one might hear an echo of Christian Reconstructionism. RD contributor Julie Ingersoll, an expert on Christian Reconstructionism, once described it to me this way: "Reconstructionists claim to have an entirely integrated, logically defensible Christian worldview. Reconstructionism addresses everything you have to think about." In other words, as a society we should follow (preferably) Biblical Law, and dispense with all but a small handful of civil laws.

The younger Paul may not be an ardent Christian Reconstructionist -- he may not even realize its influence on his views -- but his father, Congressman Ron Paul, used to employ one of Christian Reconstrutionism's leading thinkers, Gary North, on his staff. North is the son-in-law of the founder of Christian Reconstructionism, R.J. Rushdoony.

Howard Phillips, the former Nixon administration official who founded the Conservative Caucus and Constitution Party (formerly the U.S. Taxpayers Party) and co-founded the powerful Council for National Policy, claims Rushdoony as his mentor. Phillips once observed, "Much of the energy in the home school movement, the Christian school movement, the right-to-life movement, and in the return of Christians to the political world, is directly traceable to Dr. Rushdoony's work." James Dobson, who offered a last-minute endorsement of Paul, had voted for Phillips in 1996 as "protest vote" against the GOP. Ron Paul spoke at the Constitution Party's fundraiser in 2009, as did John Birch Society president John McManus.

Reconstructionists share the worldview of the John Birch Society, which as Adele Stan reported, has enthusiastically praised Paul's victory over Republican Trey Grayson. (In 1963 -- the year Rand Paul was born and, he claimed on Rachel Maddow's show, he would have marched with Martin Luther King, Jr. -- the John Birch Society insisted that proposed civil rights laws were "in flagrant violation of the 10th amendment," and threatened individual freedom.) On the 40th anniversary of the Civil Rights Act, in 2004, the elder Paul stated on the floor of the House, "The Civil Rights Act of 1964 not only violated the Constitution and reduced individual liberty; it also failed to achieve its stated goals of promoting racial harmony and a color-blind society." (h/t Rachel Maddow's twitter feed).

Many Christian Reconstructionists believe certain forms of slavery are biblical. As I wrote in a post last month, the resurgence of the JBS (it was a co-sponsor of this year's Conservative Political Action Conference) alongside Christian Reconstructionism signals a resurgence of the sort of mish-mash of states' rights and individual liberty arguments made by libertarians and tea partiers -- in Paul's case, federal civil rights laws are portrayed as some sort of government invasion of liberty -- in which civil rights protections are flipped on their head and portrayed as antithetical to (white people's) freedom.

Diana Butler Bass, who dissected Virginia Governor (then candidate) Bob McDonnell's thesis as a piece of Christian Reconstructionist thinking, told me after McDonnell omitted mention of slavery from his proclamation of Confederate History Month:

Others have deftly shown what's historically wrong with Paul's claims. As Blair L. M. Kelley wrote at Salon, Paul's arguments "echo the arguments made for segregation in his state before the turn of the 20th century," when, in Kentucky, a state senator "proposed a new law requiring railroads 'to furnish separate coaches or cars for the travel or transportation of the white and colored passengers.'"

At TAPPED, Adam Serwer unpacked Paul's feeble defense of his stance (claiming that he finds racism "abhorrent" and would have marched with King):

Paul seems to think that good Christians don't need civil laws (or civil rights laws, for that matter) for them to do the right thing. But it's crucial to ascertain what that "right thing" really is.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: apostate; paul; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: NativeNewYorker

Exactly.


61 posted on 05/22/2010 10:01:58 AM PDT by Christian_Capitalist (Taxation over 10% is Tyranny -- 1 Samuel 8:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: IMissPresidentReagan; CourtneyLeigh; Just Kimberly; Knuckrider; MBohman; republicanbob1; jcwky; ...
A Kentucky Ping.

...for those interested. :D
RP, Really has 'em riled-up...they're pin-heads are 'bout to pop.


62 posted on 05/22/2010 10:04:41 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Zer0 to the voters: "Here's my DeathCARE Plan"...now....just die (quicky), please. :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: all the best

oh its not simply projection at this point...weve allowed ourselves to be manipulated by the desire to not be labeled racist...eff em, they can screech and howl racist and biggot all they want, doesnt change the fact that I’d fight for a black, white, or purple mans freedom from tyranny, and if he chooses to limit his customer base, its HIS business to do so...period...


63 posted on 05/22/2010 10:37:28 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Christian_Capitalist

Wow. That’s outrageous. As you say, not only did Rand Paul’s actual quote from the article totally not match anything in the headline, but the writer uses some extremely tortured logic to try to hang the whole Christian Reconstructionist movement around Rand Paul’s neck.

She begins by stating that Rand Paul is a mainline Protestant. Then she goes on to inform the reader that:

1. R.J. Rushdoony is the founder of Christian Reconstructionism

2. Gary North (a Christian Reconstructionist) is the son-in-law of R.J. Rushdoony

3. Gary North was once employed by Ron Paul (who is presumably not a Christian Reconstructionist)

4. Ron Paul is Rand Paul’s father

5. Therefore, she concludes, Christian Reconstructionism has certainly influenced Rand Paul’s views, although he himself may not recognize it.

Just wow.


64 posted on 05/22/2010 10:40:17 AM PDT by lonevoice (If Fox News is the only outlet reporting it, did it really happen?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: esquirette

They are a free download on Project Gutenberg.

Here is the HTML version of the Federalist Papers:

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1404/1404-h/1404-h.htm

Here is the plain text version:

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1404/1404-8.txt

Here are several forms of the audio versions:

http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/22788


65 posted on 05/22/2010 1:12:33 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Christian_Capitalist
Romans 13:10
Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.
66 posted on 05/22/2010 2:59:07 PM PDT by Theophilus (Not merely prolife, but prolific!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice
As you say, not only did Rand Paul’s actual quote from the article totally not match anything in the headline, but the writer uses some extremely tortured logic to try to hang the whole Christian Reconstructionist movement around Rand Paul’s neck....

And don't forget the John Birch Society, just kinda thrown in there like an under-bed bogeyman at nearly-random points throughout the article.

Yeah, it's pretty objective, unbiased Journalism, all right.

67 posted on 05/22/2010 3:57:51 PM PDT by Christian_Capitalist (Taxation over 10% is Tyranny -- 1 Samuel 8:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Biblical Calvinist

Thanks for the referral!


68 posted on 05/22/2010 4:02:27 PM PDT by Christian_Capitalist (Taxation over 10% is Tyranny -- 1 Samuel 8:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Flycatcher
10-4 on that.

As I mentioned to another poster on this thread -- yes, this really is what the Left considers thoughtful, informed Religion Journalism.

69 posted on 05/22/2010 5:08:56 PM PDT by Christian_Capitalist (Taxation over 10% is Tyranny -- 1 Samuel 8:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; bamahead

This isn’t precisely a “Libertarian” topic, but I do expect that there’s a lot of Christians on your Libertarian ping lists; they might appreciate a ping to this article. (Just a suggestion, thanks).


70 posted on 05/22/2010 5:32:45 PM PDT by Christian_Capitalist (Taxation over 10% is Tyranny -- 1 Samuel 8:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metesky
I agree with you in principle, but Paul just about got mauled for discussing the subject in even an abstract sense.

In his somewhat-rambling, halting way, Rand Paul's been about as brave on this subject as a national-level politician can get away with in this day and age. But he shouldn't let it define his whole campaign, there's too many other important issues that are crying for real solutions.

71 posted on 05/22/2010 5:38:27 PM PDT by Christian_Capitalist (Taxation over 10% is Tyranny -- 1 Samuel 8:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Christian_Capitalist
But he shouldn't let it define his whole campaign, there's too many other important issues that are crying for real solutions.

I agree.

72 posted on 05/23/2010 2:30:38 AM PDT by metesky (My retirement fund is holding steady @ $.05 a can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson