Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Frontier Feminism
The Spearhead ^ | May 21, 2010 | Hawaiian Libertarian

Posted on 05/21/2010 2:07:19 PM PDT by Christian Cage

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
A provocative look at Sarah Palin's disquieting connections to some aspects of feminism. Long overlooked by many mainstream conservatives.
1 posted on 05/21/2010 2:07:19 PM PDT by Christian Cage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Christian Cage

If Palin supported legalization of dope, Liberaltarians would ADORE her.


2 posted on 05/21/2010 2:12:31 PM PDT by Grunthor (Faster than the speed of smell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Christian Cage

Hmm. So you think that women should be paid less than men for the same jobs [and I do mean the VERY same jobs] and otherwise be treated as less than men? I have a religion for you: Islam.


3 posted on 05/21/2010 2:15:26 PM PDT by Nepeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Christian Cage

I think there is a strain of feminism, however miniscule, which is not contradictory to either Christianity or conservatism. Though I agree that most feminism is an exercise in female-superiority ... there appears to be a brand of feminism which is truly dedicated to legal equality of opportunity, and personal strength of character and faith ... not to the denigration of men.

That my wife is a strong, bright, capable woman does not detract from me in the least — it is a reflection of the household that I head.

SnakeDoc


4 posted on 05/21/2010 2:16:14 PM PDT by SnakeDoctor ("The world will know that free men stood against a tyrant [...] that even a god-king can bleed.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Christian Cage

A bit nutty, if you ask me. Frontier women were not known for daintiness. In pre-civil war Texas, they had to be pretty good with a gun in case the Comanches came to steal the silver/young children.


5 posted on 05/21/2010 2:17:18 PM PDT by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Christian Cage
The pioneer women were absolutely dependent on their men…just as the men were dependent on their women!

Not quite. Frontier men outnumbered women between twenty to one and ten to one for a century, and many of those women were disease-carrying prostitutes, aka "Frontier Feminists."

6 posted on 05/21/2010 2:18:14 PM PDT by Anti-Utopian ("Come, let's away to prison; We two alone will sing like birds I' th' cage." -King Lear [V,iii,6-8])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SnakeDoctor

Hooboy - this is gonna be taken completely wrong, but: the act of submission is a voluntary placing of someone else’s priorities over your own. IOW, when Paul tells wives to “submit to your husbands”, he’s acknowledging that they have full power and authority over themselves, but that they should voluntarily let the husband be the final authority so that there is a final decider who will be held accountable.

Snake Doc, I’m with you. My wife of 24 years and 9 months is just like yours, and I’m prouder of her every day.

Colonel, USAFR


7 posted on 05/21/2010 2:47:32 PM PDT by jagusafr (Don't make deals with pirates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Christian Cage

Marx said that capitalism must be destroyed because it enslaved women.

In reality, Feminism has done it by destroying the family and leaving “liberated” women dependent on government.


8 posted on 05/21/2010 3:01:26 PM PDT by donna (SarahPAC has donated money to...(wait for it)...Lindsey Graham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Christian Cage

Weak attack on Palin and on conservative feminists.

Expect a counter and if I were the author of this I’d take cover.


9 posted on 05/21/2010 3:17:47 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Utopian
Not quite. Frontier men outnumbered women between twenty to one and ten to one for a century, and many of those women were disease-carrying prostitutes, aka "Frontier Feminists."

You're commenting on the Old West Frontier period from, say the late 1860s to about 1890. The true Frontier period in America goes back to 1620.

10 posted on 05/21/2010 3:18:43 PM PDT by Inyo-Mono (Had God not driven man from the Garden of Eden the Sierra Club surely would have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Christian Cage

And conservative blacks who say they are for black empowerment through conservative principles would upset you too, I suppose.


11 posted on 05/21/2010 3:19:49 PM PDT by 9YearLurker (P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Christian Cage
"... that suffrage and the social engineering that has propelled women en masse into what was once the male sphere of gender roles are all still “good” things."


The suffrage part I agree with, but strongly dissent on the social engineering part. Social engineering is inherently opposed to individual liberty and should be opposed by those who cherish our tradition of ordered liberty.
12 posted on 05/21/2010 3:32:23 PM PDT by rob777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donna

There was a good article posted here the other day about how 70 percent of single women, including single moms, voted for O’Bummer. Those voters lie at the heart of the welfare state. They are the vanguard for the bankrupting of America.


13 posted on 05/21/2010 3:41:07 PM PDT by heye2monn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: heye2monn

November 14, 2008
Women’s Voting Patterns in Election 2008

Unmarried women supported Barack Obama by a 70-to-29 percent margin, and they voted for Democratic House candidates by a similar margin — 64-to-29 percent. These margins mean that unmarried women edged out both younger voters and Hispanic voters as the demographic with the strongest support for President-elect Obama.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2132289/posts


14 posted on 05/21/2010 3:58:24 PM PDT by donna (SarahPAC has donated money to...(wait for it)...Lindsey Graham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

There are always going to be people who cannot handle the existence of strong women--and I mean strong in the sense of character, values, convictions, rationality, intelligence, and loyality, not whining liberal "gimme" women who want the world handed to them--but as they curse strong conservative women, they are in effect saying that conservatism belongs only to men, and that women are just along as baggage.

The whole notion of individuals not being allowed to be strong individual conservatives because they are women is so repugnant I have to wonder if this thread is a plant to make conservatism look like it is as backward as libs say.
15 posted on 05/21/2010 5:08:56 PM PDT by Nepeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: donna
Unmarried women supported Barack Obama by a 70-to-29 percent margin, and they voted for Democratic House candidates by a similar margin — 64-to-29 percent. These margins mean that unmarried women edged out both younger voters and Hispanic voters as the demographic with the strongest support for President-elect Obama.

Since this voting pattern is undesirable, the solution is to what? Bar women from voting?
16 posted on 05/21/2010 5:11:09 PM PDT by Nepeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nepeta

It’s just a fact. No reason to get emotional about it.

Obviously, Feminism is lying to these women. We don’t want to pretend that there is a conservative version of Feminism, that’s for sure.


17 posted on 05/21/2010 5:25:15 PM PDT by donna (SarahPAC has donated money to...(wait for it)...Lindsey Graham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Christian Cage

And what, exactly, are conservative men doing to help Sarah take back their country?


18 posted on 05/21/2010 5:30:57 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donna
It’s just a fact. No reason to get emotional about it.

Obviously, Feminism is lying to these women. We don’t want to pretend that there is a conservative version of Feminism, that’s for sure.


I have difficulty accepting being told that I am an inferior underperson after decades of living otherwise and 5 decades of being a conservative. I believe in the individual and in individual liberty--even for individual women.

Damning other people to underpersonhood on the basis of ovaries/no ovaries and melanin is the kind of thing liberals damn conservatives for doing. I have never done it, although I will plainly label an idiot as such if they deserve that label. I've known lots of witless men and lots of witless women of all descriptions.
19 posted on 05/21/2010 5:33:58 PM PDT by Nepeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Nepeta

Those voices you hear telling you women are inferior are coming from the base of Feminism:

“The place of the family as a shut-in petty enterprise was to be occupied, according to the plans, by a finished system of social care and accommodation: maternity houses, creches, kindergartens, schools, social dining rooms, social laundries, first-aid stations, hospitals, sanatoria, athletic organizations, moving-picture theaters, etc. The complete absorption of the housekeeping functions of the family by institutions of the socialist society...”
- Leon Trotsky -


20 posted on 05/21/2010 5:41:26 PM PDT by donna (SarahPAC has donated money to...(wait for it)...Lindsey Graham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson