Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: K-oneTexas
Although these soldiers should be recognized the Military Regulations for the issuance of a Purple Heart are in no way met by those stationed at Fort Hood.

Help me out here... doesn't this

(6) After 28 March 1973, as a result of an international terrorist attack against the United States or a foreign nation friendly to the United States, recognized as such an attack by the Secretary of the Army, or jointly by the Secretaries of the separate armed services concerned if persons from more than one service are wounded in the attack.

apply?

63 posted on 05/19/2010 12:19:54 PM PDT by r-q-tek86 (It isn't settled because it isn't science)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: r-q-tek86

I don’t believe that Major Hassan would be considered a an ‘international terrorist attack’. Under any stretch of the imagination.

Major Nidal Hasan, a U.S. Army psychologist, other than being a follower of the Muslim religion, has no known ties to international terrorist groups. Plus he is not an international terrorist plot ... he went on a shooting rampage, pure and simple.

I see no way the shootings at Fort Hood would qualify as ‘an international terrorist attack against the United States ‘.


64 posted on 05/19/2010 12:28:47 PM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson