Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Scanian
Okay, I read his position on his website concerning national defense and I like what it had to say. I especially like how it started out:

"I believe that the primary Constitutional function of the federal government is national defense, bar none."

No truer words were ever spoken. However, I want to know his stance on the current war on terror. It doesn't really matter to me about his stance on Iraq because I believe for all intents and purposes, that war is over. The hot war now is in Afghanistan and the moutainous regions of Pakistan. What is his position on this? Does he want to go balls to the wall and clean these cesspools out and defeat the Taliban and Al Queada?
26 posted on 05/19/2010 5:18:02 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Old Teufel Hunden
until i get a chance to discuss it over a burger, the 'politics' are gonna appear to be all over the map...

oath to the Constitution is a good first step tho, for all wannabe 'leaders'...

28 posted on 05/19/2010 5:21:12 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson