Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Friendofgeorge

Reagan came on the cusp of a new vision of conservatism. He would have adapted and led conservative members in the same spirit that many members of FR have adopted.

Reagan would have helped articulate what it means to be a RINO, Reagan would have welcomed Rush Limbaugh to the White House and encouraged people to tune into Rush. Likewise Reagan would have singled out many other conservatives for praise and promotion.

FR would be firmly behind Reagan and Reagan would be our conservative leader.

Reagan in his time did not have the numbers of conservatives members to draw upon for supreme court nominations. Conservatism in legal circles was nascent and undeveloped.

As to your attempt to drive a wedge between FR conservatives and a beloved historical leader of theirs in history, you are wasting your time.


34 posted on 05/16/2010 10:50:04 AM PDT by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Hostage

FR would have despised Reagan and called him a RINO due to amnesty.


35 posted on 05/16/2010 10:51:50 AM PDT by ShandaLear (The price of Obamacare? 30 pieces of silver.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Hostage

“As to your attempt to drive a wedge between FR conservatives and a beloved historical leader of theirs in history, you are wasting your time.”

No one here is attacking Reagan. Many are however pointing out that the attacks on Palin over endorsements and other made up controversies are counter productive. No candidate agrees with us 100% and if that is our standard then Reagan, as has been pointed out by the author of this thread and others, would have been destroyed before he was given a chance to govern and move our country in the right direction. This is a cautionary tale of destroying our chance to once again have influence as we had under Reagan; attacking Sarah Palin (the attacks go beyond just policy disagreements or disagreements over decisions) because she sees the political opportunities differently than we do will ensure our defeat. Do I wish she would have opposed John McCain’s relection? Sure, but I can understand why she made her choice. I can also understand backing Fiorina to deny Campbell (a true RINO) the nomination and to ultimately have the best chance to defeat Boxer. Some here see those as unforgiveable: they are the same people who would have turned on Reagan simply because they could not understand his decisions at the time.


40 posted on 05/16/2010 11:20:37 AM PDT by OwatonnaNative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson