Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigtigermike
Everything? These people?

Many people here will criticize Sarah on one thing today (Fiorina) then loudly applaud her the next day on AZ/immigration.

Yes there are a few who seem not to like her regardless, but let's not become like the "Yes we can, change, change, change!" Obamulan zombies.

19 posted on 05/16/2010 9:52:52 AM PDT by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: DTogo

Prove it! 90% of those continuously trashing Sarah currently are not saying “I disagree with Sarah on Carla,McCain but she is right on this and that”

No they are spinning everything she says about the border, illegal immigration....etc.... as though she is the SPAWN OF THE DEVIL....only a few have admitted an “agree to disagree” attitude

It’s not Sarah worshiping; it’s the fact that no one of the other potentials are coming to the forefront on these current issues right now, and Sarah doing her best to speaking out,you don’t have to say that she will be the next POTUS, you don’t have to agree on everything she says....bu to dog her left and right calling her a WH*RE, “enemy of the State” as some here has said is wrong


24 posted on 05/16/2010 10:02:49 AM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Finally, a little perspective on the world of politics that at least attempts to maintain contact with reality.

Reagan was the greatest president since Lincoln. Yet, he pushed amnesty for 3 million illegals, he nominated a RINO as his VP, and he supported many candidates that would today be considered RINOS. Reagan negotiated with the devil (Tip O’Neil) and made an ill-fated agreement to raise taxes with the promise of future reductions in spending. Quite frankly, he would have been savaged by the same group that is going after Sarah Palin from the right side today. There are many reason why Reagan compromised and in the end he was successful in bringing a more conservative nation for 20 years through those compromises. It really is hard to call them compromises; instead, like Palin’s forays into areas that are counter to her conservative principles, these “compromises” are really an attempt to coopt those that might not be supportive to gain power. Only then will she have the ability to influence as Reagan did. I know we have been burned by false conservatives in the past, but Sarah Palin is not the false conservative some here would try to portray her as.


25 posted on 05/16/2010 10:07:29 AM PDT by OwatonnaNative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson