Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum

Is it not obvious why he is MSNBC’s token Conservative(sic).


2 posted on 05/16/2010 9:17:24 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mnehring
"Is it not obvious why he is MSNBC’s token Conservative(sic)."

Two words...straw man.

64 posted on 05/16/2010 10:43:43 AM PDT by Red Dog #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring
Pat is the “conservative” bogeyman the Leftists like to promote as the face of conservatism to keep liberal Jewish people ‘on the plantation’.

What a bunch of identity politics garbage.

The law is the law.

My interests and view of the law is promoted and defended far more by a CONSERVATIVE ORIGANALIST view, than by someone who shares my religious beliefs or racial descent.

In other words, I don't care how many Catholics or Jewish people there are on the SCOTUS, I care how many think the Constitution is a “living” document that means whatever they want it to mean on any given day.

The legal interests of Protestants are NOT only defended by Protestants on the SCOTUS. The legal interests of Catholics are NOT only defended by Catholics on the SCOTUS. The legal interests of Hispanics are NOT only defended by Hispanics on the SCOTUS. Etc, etc.

The legal interests of ALL Americans and ALL religious denomination are defended by an ORIGINALIST on the SCOTUS.

133 posted on 05/17/2010 7:35:46 AM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson