>She mentions the birth announcement and weird dating connected with it because she was coached. There is no doubt about it.
I’m inclined to agree; why would she remember a birth-announcement from some unknown, about some random person, multiple decades later?
True, some people do have photographic and near-photographic memories, but they’re fairly rare & nothing has been said about it. {I assume that if she even claimed to have near-photographic memory it would be “highlighted, boldfaced, & underlined” in the article.}
There was an almost identical “interview” with hear a year or more ago, some of it almost word for word. But this time the birth announcement stuff is trotted in. The handlers who coached her made her say that stuff because now “it’s out there”, it wasn’t out there say a year and a half or couple years ago. It was discussed on FR but not so much and not out in the ethers.
Let’s see her copy of the Honolulu papers with her babies’ birth announcements! Then we’ll talk!
She was reading a script.
That's not hard to imagine. Some women are very interested in seeing the birth announcements for their kids in the paper. They would notice that others are published first. My wife notices all kinds of things I don't.
What she neglects to say -- IF this story is true -- is WHY she remembered this (skin color, unmarried parents, knew the mother, etc.)