Posted on 05/13/2010 3:30:13 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
Back when we had men like Richard Nixon as President. I can’t imagine Carter, Clinton or Obama doing that.
A very bad mistake,should have let the Russians nuke them.
Being widely despised by the Chinese people for corruption and lack of democracy and rule of law, and with economic performance faltering, the communist regime must inevitably emphasize nationalistic themes as a basis of legitimacy. The depiction of foreigners as dangerous and untrustworthy is a long established element of Chinese nationalism.
It wouldn’t have turned into World War 3. We should have let the USSR do it. China wouldn’t be what it is today and the Soviet Union would have been badly wounded as well.
Is Tricky Dick flashing gang signage at Leonid B?
Dang, I sure missed some inresting intel, er stuff, after I became a full time civilian.
ping
Not to mention the fact that they have literally stolen most of American industry's intellectual property such as the integrated circuit, personal and super computers, and all kinds of RF\communications technology.
Additionally, their (communist) spies have stolen our rocket technology which cost hundreds of billions of tax payer dollars to develop and other military technologies such as the W-80 nuclear warhead, stealth technology, and many others.
Now they say we OWE them almost a TRILLION dollars.
I say we send them a big fat bill and slam the door shut on their prison labor produced goods.
Not only did he open trade with communist China, he took the Dollar off the Gold standard.
Now his Grandson (another globalist) thinks that he can slither into our government because of his name?!?!
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i64Yhb0y27o-nDRcsgfesrHMR8BwD9FL1ODG0
Don't we have enough problems with the legacy of Kennedy, Clinton, and Bush political thought ingrained in our government?!
I say HELL NO! We are on the brink with all of this global crap!
I do not dispute the USSR considered and planned a nuclear strike on China, I dispute Nixon threatening a US retaliatory strike.
Your analysis of current Chinese communist motivation is highly likely to be spot on. There is little new in the Chicom political playbook.
The Nixon name means as much as the Taft name.
I’m having another of those November Charlie moments.
No kidding. Wage and price controls did it for me.
So you let a commander who twice, through gross incompentence, was egregiously surprised, start running U.S. foreign policy?
First, his air force in the Phillipines gets destroyed on the ground TEN HOURS AFTER PEARL HARBOR.
Second, despite numerous warnings and intelligence about Chinese infiltration into North Korea, his forces are completely surprised and in several cases almost surrounded and annihilated when they do attack?
Most overrated general in U.S. military history.
I'll go for that!
Nixon was the man with enough foreign policy savvy to realize that a fullblown war between the two Asian behemoths would be a worldwide catastrophe. This is why the Chinese had great respect for Nixon, despite his antipathy to communism.
Hey made some good photo ops though wading in the the ocean like that. And you have to give him credit for his campaign to re-take the Pacific and the landing at Incheon.
Reminds me of the fable of a frog saving a scorpion. To be honest, the US will one day be the winner of the 'Darwin Award of the Year.' Guaranteed. The nation just tries so very hard to qualify (e.g. the China escapades, Pakistan, etc), and one day its luck will run out.
Traitors in the FDR and Truman administrations handed China over to Mao.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.