I get jarred by misinformation, and it makes me distrust other information given, especially when there are sources to get correct information. I like to read about this best when it’s fact-based. Many people on these threads do a good job of immediately debunking certain errors, usually way before I can get to the thread as I mostly have limited time. Very few debunk the other type. Do you think it serves either the eligibility argument or the discussion to let errors like the Pakistan travel ban myth be constantly repeated? I don’t.
Most of my early debunking centered on a few common errors: the Pakistan travel myth, HIPAA law, State Department policy on citizenship. I’ve gotten to enjoy the research, and started branching out. I’ve compiled an “error and myth list” and am thinking of posting it the first time in each thread I see one crop up, so just to keep things straight. And if you find something where I don’t have the facts straight, please say so I can fix it.
No, the Pakistan myth should not be continued but for its inconsistency of required elements to travel and that is even debatable.