Posted on 05/08/2010 9:56:08 AM PDT by FTJM
She’s as right to life as every idiot who says “I personally am opposed, but it’s settled law”. That’s called pro-abortion.
Carly Fiorina has been endorsed by the National Right to Life, the California Pro-Life Council, and the Susan B. Anthony List. She is pro-life, pro-traditional marriage
Horsesh*t.
typical of your mentality
If you don’t think “settled law” is a fig leaf, you just fell off the turnip truck.
The funny thing is, the people who support Boxer also support Fiorina’s progressive attitudes toward ‘free trade’ and global socialism.
So to answer your question, no, I am not.
And I was only quoting HER. If you find offense in that then you shouldn’t support her as a candidate.
Just maybe she couldn’t have children.
Same tactics, same people plus or minus, same MO, same strategy...
Believe me, this is not been lost on those that are still capable of critical thought.
you need to read up...she was dismissed as HP head
http://money.cnn.com/2005/02/09/technology/hp_fiorina/
since I originated that remark...it would be a shot at SOME of her supporters HERE and their customary behavior as one who has had it out with some of them before...and not the primary one on this thread it should be noted....so I’m not looking for a fight with anyone specific...we all know who each other is(are)
i have always supported Palin “bigtime in Cheney speak” but do not like this
Tom Campbell polls best against Boxer so this argument it was pragmatism is wrong
and not long ago Fiorina disparaged Palin herself...in a most hypocritical way I might add
so who knows why?
sisterhood crap?
lord I hope not...that would be worse than whatever this reason was
no pol is perfect..not even Magnus
Hummm. That’s good news then.
She has said in the past she would not support off shore drilling—she lost me right there.
Not having kids does not equal pro choice!
She’s got plenty of history demonstrating her globalist socialist political views.
But one wonders... even Hillary had a trophy kid to help her political aspirations.
So anyone who doesn’t have kids is suspect now?
Some people can’t have kids, btw.
Whew, I’m glad it’s not my job to stand in judgement of the childless.
Ann Coulter doesn’t have kids. Guess that means she’s not a real conservative either?
Wow, flashback. Boxtard herself once challenged Condi Rice’s competence in national security based on the fact that Condi doesn’t have kids.
Using the same arguments as Boxtard isn’t a very becoming strategy.
Isn’t our goal to win in November ?
Apparently ‘Condi’ had no competence at national security because she didn’t last very long in that position. She also very corruptly, while she held office and was on the payroll of the American people, was on the board of a global socialist NGO that actually got our tax money to redistribute in South America promoting the free traitor agenda.
If you’re comparing Fiorina and ‘Condi’, then Fiorina must have more things wrong with her candidacy, than first imagined.
But you muddy the waters try to change the subject of Fiornia’s views on abortion. You talk like a kool-aide drinker.
My point was that to attack anyone based on whether they have kids or not is a tactic of the left & quite despicable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.