This deserves a cold beer...........
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: Sub-Driver
That’s calling her stupid in a nice way.
AND it’s probably the closest that paper has come to printing the truth in years.
2 posted on
05/07/2010 9:24:30 AM PDT by
Venturer
To: Sub-Driver
Wow, end times. Liberals calling another liberal an idiot. Is bankruptcy focusing the mind out there?
3 posted on
05/07/2010 9:25:06 AM PDT by
throwback
( The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid)
To: Sub-Driver
the California Democrat doesn't display enough intellectual firepower. So NOW this is a problem?
4 posted on
05/07/2010 9:26:05 AM PDT by
Brett66
(Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: Sub-Driver
"She displays less intellectual firepower or leadership than she could." You're only as tall as your height.
5 posted on
05/07/2010 9:26:19 AM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Sub-Driver
"The Los Angeles Times on Friday declined to offer endorsements in all Democratic and Republican primaries for governor and Senate, saying the races have been undermined by politics and money." Elections have been undermined by politics? Is the whole point of an election, a political one? Are they back on the crack over at the LA Times?
I will be curious to see if they remain "neutral" during the general election. Anything short of an endorsement of the Republican candidate, is a de facto endorsement of the incumbent, IMHO.
To: Sub-Driver
Too late to gain any integrity—Ef the Times...They endorsed Zero.
To: Sub-Driver
The Los Angeles Times on Friday declined to offer endorsements in all Democratic and Republican primaries for governor and Senate, saying the races have been undermined by politics and money. As opposed to the entire state being undermined by the Los Angeles Slime.
9 posted on
05/07/2010 9:27:53 AM PDT by
Navy Patriot
(Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
To: Sub-Driver
But, will they call her "madame"?
I still think that was just the most asinine comment to make to a military officer ever.
10 posted on
05/07/2010 9:28:14 AM PDT by
Volunteer
(Though I know that the hypnotized never lie, do ya? - The Who)
To: Sub-Driver
No, to be fair to Mrs. Boxer, she’s been doing the best she can with what she has.
11 posted on
05/07/2010 9:31:54 AM PDT by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
To: Sub-Driver
I’m getting dizzy... it seems each paragraph is a repeat?
13 posted on
05/07/2010 9:34:11 AM PDT by
avacado
To: Sub-Driver
I think they finally realize that any endorsements for those promoting the Socialization of America will drive down their subscriber base.
To: Sub-Driver
To: Sub-Driver
To: Sub-Driver
If Stephen King wrote a novel about Boxer, it’d be called THE BLITHERING.
18 posted on
05/07/2010 9:38:53 AM PDT by
pogo101
To: Sub-Driver
Hunh. Boxer “doesn’t display enough intellectual firepower.”
That’s going to be hard to topple as the Understatement of the Decade.
20 posted on
05/07/2010 9:44:15 AM PDT by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: Sub-Driver
The editors at the biggest newspaper on the West Coast, who were expected to endorse Sen. Barbara Boxer in her primary campaign against token opposition, have decided to remain neutral, saying the California Democrat doesn't display enough intellectual firepower. Someone needs to keep this in mind and quote it often just before the general election. Boxer is intellectually deficient, and the voters need to be reminded when it's a choice between a qualified patriot and a slow-witted socialist.
22 posted on
05/07/2010 9:46:21 AM PDT by
Pollster1
(Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
To: Sub-Driver
... saying the California Democrat doesn't display enough intellectual firepower. They're just discovering this now?
To: Sub-Driver
*snort* They are abandoning the ship in drives. It must be really bad when one of the most liberal papers in the country refuses to endorse a democrat.Enjoy retirement Ma’am!
To: Sub-Driver
...saying the California Democrat doesn't display enough intellectual firepower.LOL, Boxer is the very picture of "stupid". The LA Times here is simply trying to elevate itself by disassociating itself from her. Believe me, they want this simpleton re-elected because she's the perfect dupe of the socialist agenda no matter how stupid she is.
The LA Times will endorse her in the general.
Bookmark, and take that to the bank.
To: Sub-Driver
It’s time to take the politics out of politics, according to the braniacs at the LA Times.
30 posted on
05/07/2010 9:51:13 AM PDT by
keepitreal
( Don't tread on me.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson