Skip to comments.
L.A. Times Declines to Endorse Sen. Boxer in California Primary
FOX ^
Posted on 05/07/2010 9:22:00 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
This deserves a cold beer...........
To: Sub-Driver
That’s calling her stupid in a nice way.
AND it’s probably the closest that paper has come to printing the truth in years.
2
posted on
05/07/2010 9:24:30 AM PDT
by
Venturer
To: Sub-Driver
Wow, end times. Liberals calling another liberal an idiot. Is bankruptcy focusing the mind out there?
3
posted on
05/07/2010 9:25:06 AM PDT
by
throwback
( The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid)
To: Sub-Driver
the California Democrat doesn't display enough intellectual firepower. So NOW this is a problem?
4
posted on
05/07/2010 9:26:05 AM PDT
by
Brett66
(Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: Sub-Driver
"She displays less intellectual firepower or leadership than she could." You're only as tall as your height.
5
posted on
05/07/2010 9:26:19 AM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: throwback
They also had a blog entry lampooning Al Franken. Could just be the stopped-clock phenomenon. Or it could be them finally opening one eye and seeing what the readership would really prefer to read.
6
posted on
05/07/2010 9:26:23 AM PDT
by
BelegStrongbow
(Ey, Paolo! uh-Clem just broke the Presideng...)
To: Sub-Driver
"The Los Angeles Times on Friday declined to offer endorsements in all Democratic and Republican primaries for governor and Senate, saying the races have been undermined by politics and money." Elections have been undermined by politics? Is the whole point of an election, a political one? Are they back on the crack over at the LA Times?
I will be curious to see if they remain "neutral" during the general election. Anything short of an endorsement of the Republican candidate, is a de facto endorsement of the incumbent, IMHO.
To: Sub-Driver
Too late to gain any integrity—Ef the Times...They endorsed Zero.
To: Sub-Driver
The Los Angeles Times on Friday declined to offer endorsements in all Democratic and Republican primaries for governor and Senate, saying the races have been undermined by politics and money. As opposed to the entire state being undermined by the Los Angeles Slime.
9
posted on
05/07/2010 9:27:53 AM PDT
by
Navy Patriot
(Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
To: Sub-Driver
But, will they call her "madame"?
I still think that was just the most asinine comment to make to a military officer ever.
10
posted on
05/07/2010 9:28:14 AM PDT
by
Volunteer
(Though I know that the hypnotized never lie, do ya? - The Who)
To: Sub-Driver
No, to be fair to Mrs. Boxer, she’s been doing the best she can with what she has.
11
posted on
05/07/2010 9:31:54 AM PDT
by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
To: Volunteer
I’ve fervently hoped she would have her comeuppance for that “call me Senator” remark, and it almost feels like the day may not be far off.
Next to Pelosi, Oprah, and Joy Behar, top most useless womyn on the planet.
12
posted on
05/07/2010 9:33:50 AM PDT
by
bigbob
To: Sub-Driver
I’m getting dizzy... it seems each paragraph is a repeat?
13
posted on
05/07/2010 9:34:11 AM PDT
by
avacado
To: Sub-Driver
I think they finally realize that any endorsements for those promoting the Socialization of America will drive down their subscriber base.
To: Sub-Driver
To: RichInOC
No, to be fair to Mrs. Boxer, shes been doing the best she can with what she has.True.
One could say that, intellectually, her burden in life is to bring water pistols to gun fights.
16
posted on
05/07/2010 9:36:10 AM PDT
by
Flycatcher
(God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
To: Sub-Driver
To: Sub-Driver
If Stephen King wrote a novel about Boxer, it’d be called THE BLITHERING.
18
posted on
05/07/2010 9:38:53 AM PDT
by
pogo101
To: RichInOC
Agreed. So was Rain Man, but I don’t want him in the Senate. 8)
19
posted on
05/07/2010 9:39:37 AM PDT
by
pogo101
To: Sub-Driver
Hunh. Boxer “doesn’t display enough intellectual firepower.”
That’s going to be hard to topple as the Understatement of the Decade.
20
posted on
05/07/2010 9:44:15 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson