This really is big news. Shouldn’t it be in the breaking section?
bump
%*&^(& !!! I cannot take it anymore....we got lucky and these last two jihadist’s couldn’t make a bomb that acutally explodes.....but, who really thinks we will be as lucky with the next idiot and his bomb? and he will not be on any terrorist watch list cause they are chasing granny and the tea partiers instead.
Janet needed space on the list for all those white Amish men.
CBS reported this?
Maybe it was a little favor for 0baga’s Pakistani boyfriend.
Still wondering if you are being set up?
Dammit, Faisalo, in Pakistan, we told you not to use cash to buy a one way plane ticket back home. You have to blame Bush for causing you to lose your home and causing temporary insanity. Now, you will have to wait until my second term to become my Director of Homeland Security.
What other bombers of the future did Obama take off that list after he got control?? If there is any question about Obama taking overt action that has made us less secure (thanwe were under Bush), this is the proof.
Breaking: Obama Administration Removed Faisal Shahzad From Terror Surveilance List Before Attack
Remarkable!
CBS must have bumped their head.
What a disaster, we really need a competency test for voting. November can’t come fast enough.
No surprises here since Devout Muslims were appointed key positions in Homeland Security late last year:
Jihad Watch Obama adminstration appoints Muslims to key Homeland Security posts — but... they’re “moderates,” aren’t they?
The track record of the two appointees, taken together with the administration’s own ability to distinguish “moderates” from “extremists” inspires anything but confidence. After all, the Fort Hood jihadist was himself a member of a panel advising the incoming Obama administration.
At the heart of this issue are the politically correct articles of faith that few dare blaspheme, which insist that there is nothing problematic about Islam’s core texts and teachings regarding warfare and the rights of women and unbelievers, and that there exists a well-defined “moderate” Islam that the West can work with. The problem is, no one ever stops to define “moderate,” for fear that articulating actual standards may cause offense.
“Devout Muslims In Key Homeland Security Posts,” by Judicialwatch via Right Side News, November 22:
Days after a devout Muslim terrorized a U.S. Army base in Texas several news reports remind that two key Homeland Security posts are occupied by equally devout Muslims, one of them a former Los Angeles deputy mayor who eliminated a crucial program that tracked terrorist activities in the city.
Earlier this year President Obama appointed Arif Alikhan to be the nation’s Assistant Secretary for Policy Development at the Department of Homeland Security and Kareem Shora to the agency’s influential advisory council, which provides recommendations and advice directly to the Secretary of Homeland Security.
Alikhan, who leads a Homeland Security team responsible for developing policy issues to secure the country against terrorism, has referred to the renowned terrorist organization Hezbollah as a “liberation movement” and was responsible for killing a Los Angeles Police project that monitored terrorist activities in the city’s notoriously radical mosques. The defunct Muslim terror tracking plan was designed to identify hotbeds of extremism in an area where several locals offered the September 11 hijackers support.
Shora was the head of a well-known Arab organization whose officials refer to anti-U.S. jihadists as heroes. As executive director of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC), Shora had close ties to radical Ivy League professor Rashid Khalidi, a Palestinian terror supporter who has reportedly worked on behalf of the extremist Palestine Liberation Organization....
GREAT NEWS!!!
This MUST be publicized!!!
Bump.
He wants us to be hit. I’ve been saying this just forever.
And Shahzad is definitely Ozero’s “type.”
What might have been the reason for his being taken off the list? A nice contribution to the Democrats, perhaps? No one with his name appears on the FEC political contribution list, but he could have contributed under an alias or with a group, could have contributed less than the minimum amount required to report, or perhaps the organization he contributed to failed to report his contribution.
The shocker here is that CBS reported it.