I read that article earlier from the link posted down thread and I was a little skeptical. Remember, the author was pushing the other guy and it looked like he did some cherry picking to shed the worst possible light on Coats. I remember Coats as a senator and I don’t remember ever worrying about him. I believe that on the critical issues and votes, he will stand with the caucus, ie., he won’t be a “maverick” or join with the two or three goofballs who side with the rats.
It doesn’t matter now anyway. Gotta go with Coats.
FRegards,
LH