Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Star Traveler

I see a big problem with the hypothesis that discovery is of petrified wood remains of Noah’s Ark.

There are many factors involved in producing petrified wood, including burial in certain minerals, high temperatures, and high pressure.

Any wood, sitting on the surface of a mountain, buried in snow and ice, will never never never never ever petrify.

The only way that one could find petrified wood remains of Noah’s Ark on the side of a mountain, buried in snow and ice, would be if the Ark were built out of petrified wood to begin with.


58 posted on 05/05/2010 9:01:50 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2
You were saying ...

I see a big problem with the hypothesis that discovery is of petrified wood remains of Noah’s Ark.

I think that Dr. Randall Price sees a problem with that, too, according to what I've heard (see his interview in Post #28)

And Dr. Randall Price is also looking for Noah's Ark, on Mt. Ararat, so he's not saying that (about the petrified wood) from the standpoint of denying that the ark exists. He believes it's there, but he doesn't think that "this group" has found it...

60 posted on 05/05/2010 9:12:16 AM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson