Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ArrogantBustard

” It seems like hardly any, to me.We should have at least double that number, and we should be prepared to use them.”

Is this an emotional answer or an objective one? Why don’t we have 2 million nukes? Why 5,000? Whether you are willing to use them is another question.

What happens if you have a nuke?
a) you have to guard it
b) you have to maintain it
c) if you don’t use it, you have to remove it from your inventory and remove the nuclear material and do something with it

All of these steps cost money. Lots of it. The military is an inefficient enterprise in general.

Our country is broke. We can no longer do things without thinking about the costs. We never could. We just thought we could.


77 posted on 05/03/2010 7:10:15 PM PDT by cowtowney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: cowtowney
Is this an emotional answer or an objective one?

I don't do "emotional answers".

Why don’t we have 2 million nukes?

We don't have 2 million targets. Or even one million. Not every bomber or missile gets to its target

Our country is broke. We can no longer do things without thinking about the costs.

True, but irrelevant. We can't afford socialism. Never could. The cost of nukes is a drop in the bucket.

85 posted on 05/04/2010 6:06:07 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson