Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Secret Agent Man

***And no, the Founders and the average person never was looking at the 2nd Amendment as a granting to them to purchase personal cannons.***

Actually they did consider cannon to be private arms. There was even a horse drawn PLOW made with a built in cannon made for farmers in remote areas. I wish I could find a picture!


95 posted on 05/03/2010 9:35:25 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

Awesome! I want one!


99 posted on 05/03/2010 9:36:26 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

Yes I know there are exceptions, I know some rich private folks had cannon. But there really is no equivalent to a nuke, that was the closest thing. Just to illustrate the Founders never thought the 2nd Amendment meant citizens were going to be able to have every single type of weapon the militia/armed forces would have. They understood that if we ever did have to fight against the government, men armed personally would kill off the warped government forces and take over their heavier equipment.


105 posted on 05/03/2010 9:44:41 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson