Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zionist Conspirator

How do we fight back?


39 posted on 05/02/2010 3:11:25 PM PDT by roses of sharon (I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: roses of sharon

We fight by singing “We shall Overcome” at tea parties and rubbing their liberal faces ( MSM ) in their own ineptness.


41 posted on 05/02/2010 3:13:52 PM PDT by GOPJ ("Draw Mohammad Day" - - May 20, 2010 - Draw for freedom - draw for your children's freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: roses of sharon; wideawake
How do we fight back?

I wish I knew how. I do have a piece of advice, however: expose the dialectic. The hypocrisy of the Left and their justification of tactics they condemn in their opponents is well know. But what it little known is that the dialectic provides actual justification for this hypocrisy. This is not the usual hypocrisy that is merely part of human weakness. This is an intentional tactic. The entire world is divided between the good, progressive, "oppressed" Thesis and the evil, reactionary, oppressive Antithesis. To the dialectician, whether something is right or wrong literally depends on who does it. If the Thesis does it, it is good. If the Antithesis does it, it is bad.

Hegel was actually a "right winger" (European style) for whom the "end of history" was the nineteenth century Prussian state. However, Marx took this dialectic and ran with it, insisting that the "end of history" was in the revolutionary socialist future.

The Left's original Thesis was the working class. Despite their rhetoric (in which they still pretend that they represent "ordinary working people," believe it or not) they long since wrote actual working people off as a bunch of irredeemable Archie Bunkers. Today their various "oppressed" groups include Blacks (vis a vis whites), women (vis a vis men), Hispanics (vis a vis Anglos), children and the aged (vis a vis the middle aged), homosexuals (vis a vis heterosexuals), and even the animal/vegetable world vis a vis the human race.

Now note that none of this makes any sense. For example, "oppressed" Blacks are also very much a part of the "oppressive" human race. And there seems very little ideological glue to hold together Catholic Hispanics, Fundamentalist Blacks, and atheist homosexuals. But note that even though it shouldn't be, this "alliance of the oppressed" seems iron-clad. There is nary a peep of dissent or dissension from within it.

One thing the Left offers groups such as Blacks and Hispanics is that it will not fight against their religious beliefs if they will join it in fighting the religious beliefs of the hated Antithesis. This is an old tactic. In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the Left assured Irish Catholics that as an oppressed people, they were free to keep their (otherwise "reactionary") religious beliefs intact, while the religious beliefs of the hated English were mercilessly attacked. Similarly, in the early days of the American Indian Movement one of its leaders stated plainly that their religion was non-oppressive and that Marx's critique of religion as the opiate of the people did not apply to it.

If religious Blacks, Hispanics, moslems, and American Indians will join the Left in its attack on the religious beliefs of the hated "oppressors," they may keep their own religious beliefs intact. It's a win/win for them. I have often wondered how the radicalized Black and Hispanic clergy would act if militant "gays" invaded their churches and attacked them. But of course, as fellow members of the Grand Alliance of the Oppressed, they will never do this.

One final word. As you perhaps know, I am a Noachide rather than a chr*stian. One thing this means is that I reject the idea of two "gxds," a good one and an evil one engaged in struggle, with the evil "gxd" having temporarily taken control of the world. There is only One G-d, He is good, the Satan is merely one of His angels carrying out His orders, and ultimately it is G-d Himself Who is control of even the forces of evil, which He uses for His own purposes. This means that the forces of evil, which appear so unassailable, are actually a paper tiger. Their only power comes from the fact that everyone is so afraid of them. If our side would refuse to play their game, refuse their right to control the debate (ie, by declaring homosexuality perfectly all right while charging its opponents with "hatred"--itself a moralistic position), then it would collapse.

Push back! What right have they to condemn you for "homophobia" if you don't have the right to condemn them for homosexuality? If they won't allow you to label something immoral, then don't let them label anything immoral either!

Most of all pray to G-d. He Alone is in complete control. But I'm afraid it's going to get very very uncomfortable before it starts getting any better.

I'm sorry. This is all I know to tell you.

46 posted on 05/02/2010 3:39:16 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator ( . . . Uqera'tem deror ba'aretz, lekhol yosheveyha . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson