Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: danamco
When, where, and by who were the other two notarized documents debunked, please???

Simple. If the BC is fake, then it follows the other two must be fake, as they attest to its authenticity.

It's called deductive reasoning. You should try it some time.

184 posted on 05/06/2010 1:50:33 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]


To: curiosity
Simple. If the BC is fake, then it follows the other two must be fake, as they attest to its authenticity.

It's called deductive reasoning. You should try it some time.

It took you some time to come up with that tap-dancing answer. Is that the best you can come up with, or who did you have to counsel with, - your employer in the White House?

And then how come that you continue to defend and protect your dear leader's fake B.C.??

Kind like you want to wash clean your both dirty feet in two different buckets of water at the same time. You don't think that the dem's Senator's none-binding Resolution 511 was made to cover up for your dear leader's ineligibility and neuter McPain as living in a glass house???

185 posted on 05/06/2010 6:52:46 PM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson