“Its not just “apples and oranges,” its deception and irrelevance. A subject is the property of the state, while in the US, the state is the creation of the citizens, who have the power to revoke it at any time.”
“Your argument is with the justices who have used British common law as a legal basis for their decision.”
There has not yet been a case where such erroneous deliberations have occured WRT the elegibility of a candidate for the presidency. It is not likely that there ever will be since the issue was decided in favor of Vattel’s arguments twice, and that has not been subsequently readdressed.
Our problem is the reluctance of the court to remove an impostor. Its not that they doubt that he is an impostor; they just don’t wish to set the precident themselves.
.