Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tublecane
The 14th amendment disagrees with him.

The federal appellate courts, chiefly from the FDR court packing era, have interpreted the 14th to confer auto-citizenship on anchor babies. However, the only SCOTUS decision to touch indirectly upon the matter, post civil war, thought otherwise.

And yes, by the fruit of the poison vine, those who derived their citizenship through extra-constitution means, my be striped of those rights after an unfavorable SCOTUS ruling.

68 posted on 04/29/2010 5:45:13 AM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Amerigomag

“And yes, by the fruit of the poison vine, those who derived their citizenship through extra-constitution means”

Anchor babies do not receive their citizenship through extra-constitutional means. You imply that because their parents reside here at the time of their birth illegally, their citizenship status is somehow poisoned. Only their illegal is a statutory matter, not a Constitutional matter. Also, the sins of the father are not visited upon their children.

Anchor babies arrive at citizenship by perfectly Constitutional means. They are citizens by right of the soil, regardless of how they came to be born on the soil, except of course if they weren’t under the jurisdiction of U.S. law at the time of birth. Which illegal aliens obviously are.


74 posted on 04/30/2010 1:54:43 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: Amerigomag

their illegal = their illegality


75 posted on 04/30/2010 1:56:12 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson