Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
So, you think the Judge will simply eliminate the crux of the issue. That an 18 year decorated veteran citing his oath to the supreme law of our land is being obstructed and he will not partake in that illegality. Never mind Obama. Keep him out of it for a minute for this discussion.

An officer of the armed forces is citing a violation of the constitution. When his lawyer opens his arguments, its no longer about a BC or disobeying an order to clean a latrine. Its about a Kenyan Citizen commanding the United States armed forces in clear violation of the constitution.

A blatant miscarriage of justice is going to do even more damage to Obamas claims of legitimacy.

154 posted on 04/30/2010 5:41:26 AM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: PA-RIVER
So, you think the Judge will simply eliminate the crux of the issue.

The crux of the issue is that LCOL Lakin refused to deploy with his unit and refused to obey the lawful order of his superior officer. Obama could be unmasked tomorrow and found to be a total fraud, and that would not change the charges against Lakin in the slightest. He would still be guilty of missing movement and still be guilty of disobeying a lawful order.

155 posted on 04/30/2010 5:47:37 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson