Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the OlLine Rebel

Certainly there would be a short period where there is little to no new growth. The world covered in water brings with it a great deal of mud. Much of what was once on the face of the earth was buried under massively thick layers of mud. The point is that there were very few resources in the area and it makes practical sense that the ark was used for other purposes after the waters receded. Why would they keep it in tact? To what end?


41 posted on 04/28/2010 5:02:26 AM PDT by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: numberonepal

Sure, but if it’s only 40 days, wouldn’t some of the trees survive? And we have no idea about how much was “just mud”, although that’s not the indication in the Bible. As someone mentioned, the olive branch....


42 posted on 04/28/2010 5:47:34 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson