Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Blueflag
What’s my point? If someone is going to cover my risk of illness or injury with insurance, they can set REASONABLE requirements on my behaviour and my compliance or else move me into a higher risk (ie higher premium) group.

That's why I hate insurance. It is a private form of collectivism that leads to public collectivism. I'd prefer to cover my own risks and reap my own benefits but now we will suffer under a new law that will enslave us all. As slaves, we might eat better, dress better, exercise more, be assigned a better job or mate and even enjoy life more.

I would take my own chances, reasonable or not.

39 posted on 04/27/2010 7:44:12 AM PDT by Theophilus ('a dog is smarter than its tail', but if the tail were smarter, then the tail would 'wag the dog'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Theophilus

Agreed. Insurance is a substitute for liquid cash on hand ready to cover risks.

Few folks have the cash to cover the risk of losing their house to fire/storm or their health to catastrophic illness.

We ought to be able to cover others risks out of investments. But that is easier said than done.


45 posted on 04/27/2010 7:55:06 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson