To: ventanax5
Remember that ash cloud? It didn't exist, says new evidence Didn't exist? BS.
Not have been as dense as predicted by computer models? Maybe.
Safe to fly through? I wouldn't have bet on that with my planes and passengers without a lot more testing of the ash and my engines. I doubt that GE or Pratt&Whitney have much advice on volcanic dust other than "Avoid it".
Great chance for flying a plane through it (or at least the edges) or flying weather balloons through it to take samples to see how accurate the computer models are? Yes, but it sounds like it was missed.
25 posted on
04/26/2010 8:02:02 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(Obamacare: The 2010 version of the Intolerable Acts.)
To: KarlInOhio
Obviously the ash existed but what didn’t exist was actual hard data on location and density.
30 posted on
04/26/2010 8:06:07 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: KarlInOhio
Safe to fly through? I wouldn't have bet on that with my planes and passengers without a lot more testing of the ash and my engines. I doubt that GE or Pratt&Whitney have much advice on volcanic dust other than "Avoid it".
Ash clouds, or particles carried a thousand miles? There is a difference, and you are incorrect.
35 posted on
04/26/2010 8:10:45 AM PDT by
Tzfat
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson