Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ventanax5
Remember that ash cloud? It didn't exist, says new evidence

Didn't exist? BS.

Not have been as dense as predicted by computer models? Maybe.

Safe to fly through? I wouldn't have bet on that with my planes and passengers without a lot more testing of the ash and my engines. I doubt that GE or Pratt&Whitney have much advice on volcanic dust other than "Avoid it".

Great chance for flying a plane through it (or at least the edges) or flying weather balloons through it to take samples to see how accurate the computer models are? Yes, but it sounds like it was missed.

25 posted on 04/26/2010 8:02:02 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Obamacare: The 2010 version of the Intolerable Acts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KarlInOhio

Obviously the ash existed but what didn’t exist was actual hard data on location and density.


30 posted on 04/26/2010 8:06:07 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: KarlInOhio
Safe to fly through? I wouldn't have bet on that with my planes and passengers without a lot more testing of the ash and my engines. I doubt that GE or Pratt&Whitney have much advice on volcanic dust other than "Avoid it".

Ash clouds, or particles carried a thousand miles? There is a difference, and you are incorrect.
35 posted on 04/26/2010 8:10:45 AM PDT by Tzfat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson