Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H

That is an interesting point, though I’d like to see the entirety of the opinion.

Scalia is a good man, I cannot imagine he would approve of a socialized health plan. Hmm.


18 posted on 04/24/2010 8:50:01 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Recovering_Democrat
It was an all out endorsement of Wickard.

...the authority to enact laws necessary and proper for the regulation of interstate commerce is not limited to laws governing intrastate activities that substantially affect interstate commerce. Where necessary to make a regulation of interstate commerce effective, Congress may regulate even those intrastate activities that do not themselves substantially affect interstate commerce.

J. Scalia, concurring in Raich, 6 June 2005

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-1454.ZC.html

21 posted on 04/24/2010 9:10:51 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Hush! Hush! They’re ALL in on this TREASON and they know it’s TREASON.


31 posted on 04/24/2010 10:34:57 AM PDT by Waco (Kalifonia don't need no stenkin oil and no stenkin revenues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
“Scalia is a good man, I cannot imagine he would approve of a socialized health plan”

He was apparently so blinded by the war on some drugs, that he was willing to destroy to Constitution to keep people from growing marijuana in their own homes, sanctioned by State law.

41 posted on 04/24/2010 3:36:03 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson