Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conimbricenses

Ron Paul ‘90s newsletters rant against blacks, gays

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/10/paul.newsletters/

WASHINGTON (CNN) — A series of newsletters in the name of GOP presidential hopeful Ron Paul contain several racist remarks — including one that says order was restored to Los Angeles after the 1992 riots when blacks went “to pick up their welfare checks.”

This is a copy of one of the “Ron Paul Political Report” newsletters, which has stirred controversy.

1 of 2 CNN recently obtained the newsletters — written in the 1990s and one from the late 1980s — after a report was published about their existence in The New Republic.

None of the newsletters CNN found says who wrote them, but each was published under Paul’s name between his stints as a U.S. congressman from Texas.

Paul told CNN’s “The Situation Room” Thursday that he didn’t write any of the offensive articles and has “no idea” who did. Watch Paul’s full interview with CNN »

“When you bring this question up, you’re really saying, ‘You’re a racist’ or ‘Are you a racist?’ And the answer is, ‘No, I’m not a racist,’” he said.

Paul said he had never even read the articles with the racist comments.


31 posted on 04/19/2010 2:17:36 PM PDT by RaceBannon (RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: rabscuttle385; onyx; SoCalPol; SoConPubbie
Well, well.......

Do you think Rabadash Rabs is going to comment on this thread?

33 posted on 04/19/2010 2:20:49 PM PDT by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: RaceBannon
Aside from doing your best Keith Olbermann-meets-Southern Poverty Law Center impression, could you remind me what your point is again?

In reviewing those newsletters (which were from Ron, not his son Rand btw), I don't see so much as a single word that would be out of place among what gets posted here on Free Republic every single day. They're certainly a tad un-PC, but not much worse than that. And it's actually mild compared to what gets said on some of the threads here about the radical gay movement etc.

Then again, we've already established with the Stormfront issue that you apply different standards to different people based on the convenience of the argument to the candidate you support. So I don't expect you to see the inconsistency here either.

37 posted on 04/19/2010 2:43:55 PM PDT by conimbricenses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson