Skip to comments.
Gibbs: W.H. press posing for cameras [“I don't think many people have to watch Fox to understand...]
Politico ^
Posted on 04/18/2010 8:58:46 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
what nonsense...
To: Sub-Driver
Please let Gibbs stay right where he is all the way through the 2012 elections.
Amen
2
posted on
04/18/2010 9:01:14 AM PDT
by
Flightdeck
(Go Longhorns)
To: Sub-Driver
This loser couldn’t sell road apples to flies.
3
posted on
04/18/2010 9:02:51 AM PDT
by
Psycho_Bunny
(Socialism is for people who've given up.)
To: Sub-Driver
This is just an extension of Obama's condescension toward the American people. Gibbs should know better than to insult the very people he has to work with.
This administration's antagonism toward ANYONE who questions them is boundless...and in very poor taste.
4
posted on
04/18/2010 9:04:27 AM PDT
by
SonOfDarkSkies
(I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself... - D.H. Lawrence)
To: Flightdeck
“Please let Gibbs stay right where he is “
Yes. Gibbs is a condescending snob like his messiah.
It’s going to be delicious to see them humbled.
5
posted on
04/18/2010 9:04:52 AM PDT
by
y6162
To: Sub-Driver
I can’t believe how thin skinned this administration is. Everyone has to love “the one”
To: SonOfDarkSkies
wow....WHAT TRANSPARENCY!!!
they already “own” the MSM...even that is a threat to them!
To: Flightdeck
Right on the money. I mean, just think how things would be if Obama had a really sharp PR flak out there instead of this simpleton.
All too many people in life and here on FR waste their energy getting all worked up when the other side has some real dumbass out making stupid statements in the media. Heck, we should be celebrating the fact that they are so bad that they will convince no one to change their mind and probably end up doing more harm than good.
I would only add to your plea that Cindy Sheehan become the new DNC Chairperson.
8
posted on
04/18/2010 9:07:11 AM PDT
by
bigbob
To: Sub-Driver
To: Sub-Driver
yes, that certain 'slant'. . .where the 'Left' is righted; to vertical. . .
10
posted on
04/18/2010 9:09:36 AM PDT
by
cricket
(We cannot allow the 'man who would be king' to be one!/No demon-no demonization. . .)
To: Sub-Driver
Does Gibbs think the general population is naive enough to accept his implied notion that the majority of the MSM represents impartial unbiased reporting, and FOX alone sticks out as a biased entity? They need to ask him what, if any, bias exists that leans to the left since he seems interested in addressing specific news outlets by name and force him into doing a go-nowhere question avoidance tap dance or tell an outright fib.
Is he really obtuse enough, or believes the American people are obtuse enough to not recognize that the reason Fox sticks out to him because it’s a contrast of extremes, not a contrast between and outlier and a neutral position.
11
posted on
04/18/2010 9:10:01 AM PDT
by
Sax
To: Sub-Driver
Gibbs and the WH do not like being questioned on anything.
12
posted on
04/18/2010 9:10:15 AM PDT
by
Thane_Banquo
(Mitt Romney: He's from Harvard, and he's here to help.)
To: Sub-Driver
I don't think many people have to watch Fox to understand thethe political slant that they have, Gibbs said. They're feeding an audience that they know want to see and hear a certain side of that argument. I watch Fox News to hear the other side of the story as the one reported by ABCNBCCBSCNN.
13
posted on
04/18/2010 9:12:09 AM PDT
by
lonestar
(Better Obama picks his nose than our pockets!)
To: Sub-Driver
He needs to keep this up so that he provides manure for someone who has just the
seedlings of journalistic testicles to grow a
real pair and ask, "Just who IS Barack Obama and how did become President?"
Keep that 'honey wagon' rolling Gibbs...
To: SonOfDarkSkies
Gibbs should know better than to insult the very people he has to work with. From Gibbs' perspective; he does not HAVE to work with Fox News. . .he allows them to be there. Leftist arrogance is not containable; it has no boundaries.
I try to imagine Gibbs' like others in MSM. ..going home to their families. ..children; et al. It does not make sense, really.
(Great for Obama; he is already at 'home' and it is 'ours' and he continues to insult his Landlord(s) daily.) We MUST cancel this lease. . .
15
posted on
04/18/2010 9:15:03 AM PDT
by
cricket
(We cannot allow the 'man who would be king' to be one!/No demon-no demonization. . .)
To: cricket
Doesn’t FOX have that Libtard. Jerry Rivers?
16
posted on
04/18/2010 9:16:52 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: Sub-Driver
I don't think many people have to watch Fox to understand thethe political slant that they have, Gibbs said. They're feeding an audience that they know want to see and hear a certain side of that argument.Why yes, Mr. Gibbs, we do want to see and hear a certain side of the argument. And that side is the TRUE side - something that your state-run media outlets like CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC, and the AP do not presently provide.
17
posted on
04/18/2010 9:16:59 AM PDT
by
meyer
(It's time...)
To: Sub-Driver
If Gibbs had any balls whatsoever, he could man it up, and speak some truth. There are more MSM outlets that have a left leaning bias than there are with a right leaning bias. The left leaning biased organizations benefit the current administration and the right leaning biased organizations hamper the administration. So, they'll pretend the left leaning bias does not exist and represents a neutral/unbiased position, and will attempt to devalue and vilify the right leaning bias. It's condensentively insulting and is a clear example that the administration is not comfortable dealing in the truth and operating in the sunshine.
18
posted on
04/18/2010 9:17:25 AM PDT
by
Sax
To: Sub-Driver
Gibbs and the WH have already lost one fight with Fox. Why are they trying to pick another fight?
19
posted on
04/18/2010 9:19:53 AM PDT
by
hsalaw
To: Sub-Driver
Because as everybody knows, the networks spend a lot of time running the daily briefings.
Uh, no, they don’t.
And of course the transcripts traditionally don’t identify the questioners, unless Bobby or whoever names them.
What is he babbling about?
20
posted on
04/18/2010 9:20:44 AM PDT
by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson