Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chris37
In law, for official purposes it often does not matter who the biological father of a child born to a married woman is.

Interesting. Although we do not actually know whether or not BHO, Sr. and Stanley Ann Dunham were ever married, it is official that they were divorced, and that BHO, Sr. accepted paternity of young Barack.

So it is an interesting legal point you raise about the FMD connection. However, it would not be on the birth certificate.

Those who wish to see that becoming-mythical, actual long-form Birth Certificate should be in Honolulu, bringing suit against the State of Hawaii, which is bound by statute to release the documentation they used to announce to the world that BHO, Jr. was a "Natural Born Citizen."

Joseph Farah of WND, among other people, would serve the cause one hell of a lot better if they concentrated their BC paper chase in the right court.

I too, would like to see the BC. But to me, it is a bit beside the point. For example, a Hawaiian Dog License or Car Title has a better chance of being truly genuine than an Hawaiian BC of this era. That is because many Hawaiian residents did their overseas relatives a favor by registering the foreign birth of young relatives in Hawaii. Not even the State has any idea which birth certificates are for real, and which were obtained under false pretenses.

Gramma Dunham, for one, could have handled it very efficiently. The hospital nonsense, the delivery doctor nonsense? Nonsense. In those days, the person who obtained the birth certificate for a little foreign kid could just say "home birth," and that was that.

So, be prepared that at the end of the long paper chase there might well be an official Hawaiian Birth Certificate .... which although a sign, still doesn't really prove anything.

In the meantime, it is incontrovertible that Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., (a drunken, wife-beating, commie polygamist bum) was the official father of our POTUS,and was a foreigner.

At any rate, what difference does this all make? If every court case underway in every court, were to suddenly take a turn in our direction, we would still be stuck with this SOB until the end of his term. The cases will take that long to come to a finale. No matter what any court finds, remember it is still up to Congress to remove the SOB.

The Constitution BHO, Jr. violated, ironically now protects him in the usurped office!

Sorry.

127 posted on 04/14/2010 12:34:39 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk (Obama. He'll bring back States' Rights. In the meantime, this ain't gonna be pretty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: Kenny Bunk

It’s no problem. Although I do consider myself a “birther”, I am not holding my breath on any of this.

I also agree that we are stuck with this man at least until the end of his first term. I am not convinced at this point that the GOP can do anything other than lose.

I HOPE that at least one state is smart enough to enact a law that requires Obama to prove his eligibilty before 2012, but I am not counting on it.

It also seems clear that Hawaii is breaking its own laws in an effort not to reveal anything on Boy Obama. Something stinks to high Heaven here, and a whole lot of people know about it.

But you know, I am not going to sweat this. If this is the half assed effort that the powers that be, the media, Bill O’ Really, Glenn Beck, and whomever else put forth to defend this great country, then so be it.

As far as the irony of the usurper being protected by the very constitution that he violated, I would expect nothing less from a stealth muslim jihadist. Their MO is to use the systems of the infidel country against itself, and that is exactly what he is doing.


133 posted on 04/14/2010 12:57:48 PM PDT by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson