[Woebama]

You are kidding? Paul is for smaller government in a bigger way than any other candidate. I think it is very heartening that people want radical change like Paul represents. If he were electible I’d work hard for him.

[circlecity]

"You are kidding? Paul is for smaller government in a bigger way than any other candidate. I think it is very heartening that people want radical change like Paul represents. If he were electible I’d work hard for him."

From an economic standpoint Paul has a lot of good things to say which need saying. It's his foriegn policy positions that turn me (and many conservatives) off.

[Mase]

Paul is for smaller government in a bigger way than any other candidate

Yeah, right. Smaller government through massive earmarking. It's constitutional dontcha know. Add to this idiocy that Paul is a truther, hangs with Alex Jones, wants Barney Frank to control the money supply and thinks surrender is an effective foreign policy and you have one incredible wacko. You Paultards are a trip.

[MNJohnnie]

Thirty-nine percent (39%) of all voters have a favorable opinion of Paul, while 30% view him unfavorably. This includes 10% with a very favorable opinion and 12% with a very unfavorable one. But nearly one-out-of-three voters (32%) are not sure what they think of Paul.

This is not a vote FOR Paul, it a vote against Obama. Rass needs to pit Paul against all the other Republicans and Obama to get a real picture of Dr Paul's strength.

Basically all this poll tells us is a growing segment of the populations is saying "Anyone is better then Obama and the Democrats".

[ari-freedom]

“You are kidding? Paul is for smaller government in a bigger way than any other candidate.”

A small government controlled by Al qaeda and Iran is too big for me.

[Bikkuri]

IATZ