Posted on 04/13/2010 12:25:33 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
Abort the bill ...
Loophole, yeah sure ...
it is also leading to sick seniors being dumped from home health and hospice. this entire system is crashing and helpless people are going to suffer....my mom is like a helpless child. cant talk or walk but is being dumped.
I heard that there is a provision in the bill that now forces the congress critters to buy into Obama Kare. Anyone know? That would be a real deal breaker! /snicker
I like that----Abort the bill, not the babies!
I heard about that provision on Rush today. If true, it is the ultimate irony and payback for not reading the bill in the first place.
REPEAL IT!!!
Loophole my a$$...they built it in there
yitbos
How about closing the Commerce Clause loophole. .gov has made it a mile wide.
A double win for Obambi. He’ll blame the increases on the evilll insurance companies rather than his bill.
My small, 60 employee engineering services company was notified today that our health care insurance bill would rise between 20 and 25% next year. Some of our competitors will drop health care, or scale back their coverages with higher deductability, etc. in order to keep their fringe costs low. Others, like us, who don’t do that will face a competitive disadvantage when bidding work.
The Democrats want price controls now to prevent premium increases as an issue on the fall ballot. Democrats denied that the health care bill provided the authority for price controls. Democrats know that in the short run, price controls will reduce premiums and not affect supply too much. Over the long run, price controls will have devasting impacts on the supply of medical care.
Price controls on insurers also forces insurers to perform the dirty work for the rats. Insurers will be forced to place price controls on medical providers. These providers will blame insurers not the rats.
Our non-profit health center faces a similar situation. We are going to look into adopting a HSA plan, and have the center deposit the money saved into the HSA for the employee. We would like to wind up neutral or better for the employees as well as the center.
In my opinion, Feinstein is the perfect example of a Kapo!
What shysters they are.
It will have to drop 11 employees first to get to the magic number of 49 in order to escape the new law.
“Some of our competitors will drop health care, or scale back their coverages with higher deductability, etc.”
Are they allowed to? Doesn’t the state set the standards for what the policy must cover?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.