Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: onyx
Nothing on FNC or Rush.

Not surprising in Rush's case. He often waits until things solidify a bit before commenting. I think he doesn't want to step into a story like this that hasn't been corroborated. Not being critical, but I have noticed this tendency with his show.

308 posted on 04/13/2010 1:02:35 PM PDT by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]


To: Tallguy

This is what is written on Michellemalkin.com

Update 3:15pm Eastern: I just heard from Mr. Plotkin that Bautsch and her boyfriend were NOT wearing Palin pins.


Always have to be sure before jumping the gun. Just have to wait and see what happens


310 posted on 04/13/2010 1:04:47 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies ]

To: Tallguy

Exactly. The NOPD or Governor Jindal will have to first speak before any news outlets will repeat the story that the attacks were caused by the victims wearing Sarah Palin pins.


311 posted on 04/13/2010 1:06:38 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies ]

To: Tallguy
[Nothing on FNC or Rush. Not surprising in Rush's case. He often waits until things solidify a bit before commenting. I think he doesn't want to step into a story like this that hasn't been corroborated. Not being critical, but I have noticed this tendency with his show.]

Good to verify. . .Michelle Malkin has reported now; having waited herself to authenticate; that they were not wearing 'Sarah Palin' pins.

313 posted on 04/13/2010 1:16:45 PM PDT by cricket (We cannot allow t he 'man who would be king' to be one!as would no doubt other He said 'mainly we sp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies ]

To: Tallguy
Not surprising in Rush's case. He often waits until things solidify a bit before commenting. I think he doesn't want to step into a story like this that hasn't been corroborated. Not being critical, but I have noticed this tendency with his show.

That's why I like Rush. If he doesn't comment, the facts aren't all in. And often, when he's suddenly away, a story will break that day, the next, or perhaps after. Then he comes back after the dust has settled to weigh in. I'm convinced he has well-placed sources that tell him when an important story is about break. He goes away, see how things settle after a bit, catches how the LSM is spinning it, then goes on the air with his opinion.

344 posted on 04/13/2010 2:48:23 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson