Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers
Mr Rogers said: "In my case - both of them - I could have told them exactly what made it illegal and provide the documents to back me up. I didn’t need to ‘discover’ evidence."

Assuming that you wisely exercised your right to remain silent during the trial, how would you "tell" them anything? How would you provide documents? It is the process of "discovery" that permits such evidence to find itself before the court.

What is it about the charges against Lakin that makes you want to deny him the ability to mount a defense? It's a serious matter for a military officer to doubt the validity of his orders. If it is found that the orders were lawful, because Obama is eligible, just exactly what harm is done? Lakin will be punished, other officers will be cautioned by his unfortunate experience, and life will go on. What is it you fear?

517 posted on 04/13/2010 6:04:10 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 510 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell

I would NOT have remained silent if tried, because I knew exactly why the orders were illegal. And yes, the defense provides documentation all the time.


519 posted on 04/13/2010 6:08:34 PM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson