To: JoSixChip
“Not without a signature...”
The NM birth certificate is ‘signed’, sealed and on ‘safety paper’. I would guess Hawaii has some similar process. At best, the military court will take that. Or they may rule the whole issue irrelevant, since it isn’t the place of an individual officer to decide if the President is the President.
They would be entirely justified in taking the word of Congress, which certified the election.
To: Mr Rogers
The NM birth certificate is signed, sealed and on safety paper. I would guess Hawaii has some similar process. At best, the military court will take that.Again, Obama is not going to let his jpg anywhere near a court of law, military or civilian.
They would be entirely justified in taking the word of Congress, which certified the election.
Except for Congress's inability to document how they ascertained Obama's eligibility.
450 posted on
04/13/2010 2:48:11 PM PDT by
edge919
To: Mr Rogers
"They would be entirely justified in taking the word of Congress, which certified the election."
I have thought of that and do not have a clear answer. Other then to say that I think that would not be as easy to justify as you say. I think the American public would stand up and take notice.
456 posted on
04/13/2010 2:53:44 PM PDT by
JoSixChip
(It's time to embrace the madness! The sooner we default the sooner we can reorganize.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson