0bama’s eligibility has never been ruled on.
The question is, why are you lying?
“0bama’s eligibility has never been ruled on.
The question is, why are you lying?”
The question is why are you stupid?
Every state that put him on the ballot ruled on his eligibility by placing him on the ballot. The people ruled on it by voting for him. The Electoral College did so by voting for him. The Congress did so by certifying the election - without any objection from any member. The Supreme Court has rejected challenges to his eligibility, which they would not do if they had concerns. The courts in Indiana have ruled Indiana’s votes were properly cast:
“Kruse and Ankeny claimed Obama does not meet the U.S. Constitution’s requirement that the president be a “natural born” citizen, because Obama’s father was a citizen of the United Kingdom at the time of his son’s birth in Hawaii.
Unlike other claimants in the so-called birther movement who deny Obama was born in Hawaii, Kruse and Ankeny argued that any U.S. citizen born of a parent who is a citizen of another country can never be president.
The Indiana Court of Appeals said it didn’t find support for that argument in its reading of the U.S. Constitution. The court ruled that “persons born within the borders of the United States are natural born citizens, for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”
http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/lake/article_4da2bd4c-62b3-556f-a97c-8c3009013129.html
You can read the court’s reasoning here:
http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/11120903.ebb.pdf
I’m not lying. You are stupid - for these facts have been pointed out to you and others on this thread repeatedly. However, facts matter little to you.