You cannot ASSUME Obama is ineligible, and then use that as proof.
If you have PROOF, this whole discussion will change. Then Obama could be found guilty of fraud, and Congress could remove him.
Your proof?
Oh...you don’t have any. You want to use the courts to find some.
Doesn’t work that way. Obama is innocent until proven guilty.
If you have PROOF, this whole discussion will change. What proof do YOU have? Ah, let me guess ... The "proof" NEVER to have appeared in a Court Room or elsewhere, except for the offices of FactCheck, a printout or computer monitor.
|
Oh...you dont have any. You want to use the courts to find some.
The coward and lying Obama won't voluntarily prove that he is eligible.
However, there is plenty of contradicting evidence to the Obama official story line if people would honesty looked at the evidence, something that you deny.
Doesnt work that way. Obama is innocent until proven guilty.
Actually, Obama is highly likely to face multiple states and their laws for him to prove that he is eligible to hold office before they put his happy @ss on the next presidential state ballots in 2012. I suspect Obozo will not run when faced with possibility of revealing his perfidy.