[etraveler13]

I went back and read it again. If you disagree with what the statutes say, It will do me no good to debate you on those issues.
It comes down to premise, Berg steps you thru it, if you don’t see it, you either don’t agree, or can’t follow it.

[curiosity]

I went back and read it again.

Good. Then you should have no trouble pointing out the section of the statute under which he was expatriated.

If you disagree with what the statutes say, It will do me no good to debate you on those issues.

I don't disagree with the statutes. I just want to be told under which provision he was expatriated.