You seem to have the misinformed belief that I give a flip what you believe. It is in the court system now. Berg is pursueing it at his speed not yours, and I pretty much guarantee that he does not give a cr!p about what you might or might not think.
Circumstantially, it makes sense to believe that Berg has heard the recording, and as such has proceeded with it. The fact that you have not heard it, means nothing.
Finally, I am not asking you to believe or judge anything. I am just passing along informtion.
Feel free to find definitive proof that this was never said, like a statement by Michelle Obama, reported by API.
I'm sure he doesn't, since it's the judges' opinions, not mine, that matter. Unfortunately, no judge seems to have thought his cases had any merit, and I suspect he will continue to find them to be of this opinion as he continues filing his frivolous suits.
Circumstantially, it makes sense to believe that Berg has heard the recording, and as such has proceeded with it.
IMHO, it doesn't make much sense to believe anything coming out of the mouth of a guy who thinks 9-11 was an inside job.
The fact that you have not heard it, means nothing.
Apparently, no one has heard it except Berg and his client, which doesn't inspire much confidence. Good luck convincing anyone with that kind of evidence.
Feel free to find definitive proof that this was never said, like a statement by Michelle Obama, reported by API.
LOL. You're asking me to prove a negative. Let me give you a little lesson in logic. The burden of proof is on the one who makes a positive assertion that something happened, not on the person who would deny it.