Posted on 04/11/2010 12:26:27 PM PDT by PreviouslyA-Lurker
A spokesman for Al Gore has issued a questionable response to the news that in October 2007 the High Court in London had identified nine errors in his movie An Inconvenient Truth. The judge had stated that, if the UK Government had not agreed to send to every secondary school in England a corrected guidance note making clear the mainstream scientific position on these nine errors, he would have made a finding that the Governments distribution of the film and the first draft of the guidance note earlier in 2007 to all English secondary schools had been an unlawful contravention of an Act of Parliament prohibiting the political indoctrination of children. ...
...We now itemize 35 of the scientific errors and exaggerations in Al Gores movie. The first nine were listed by the judge in the High Court in London in October 2007 as being errors. The remaining 26 errors are just as inaccurate or exaggerated as the nine spelt out by the judge, who made it plain during the proceedings that the Court had not had time to consider more than these few errors. The judge found these errors serious enough to require the UK Government to pay substantial costs to the plaintiff.
(Excerpt) Read more at scienceandpublicpolicy.org ...
...everyone must be out enjoying the beautiful day.
Thank you, both are now on my FB, being viewed by people who probably will not come here.
Thanx, but I’m having difficulty following what you mean.
I posted a link to my article and your link to my facebook account, where people who would never view FreeRepublic.com will hopefully look at those links and read the information therein.
Global Warming on Free Republic
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.