Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sun
It wasn’t the Pope, it was the bishops.

Of course it was the pope for allowing the bishops to aid and cover for the priests...And some of the bishops were guilty of the crimes as well...

508 posted on 04/12/2010 7:25:41 AM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies ]


To: Iscool
Okay I am going to try this again.

Bishops are given autonomy over their diocese, and could have removed this priest at any time.

The fact that Weakland was a homosexual in his own personal relationship at the time is telling.

When Ratizenger was cardinal he was in charge of the Congregation of the Faith, they would only address a priests actions if they were involved in false teachings. The Congregation of Priests, a completely different organization within the Catholic Church) handles issues having to do with priests conduct.

This matter would not even come before B16 when he was a Cardinal.

528 posted on 04/12/2010 2:59:00 PM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free, Free Republic.com baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies ]

To: Iscool

Oh please, the Pope can’t be everywhere.

It’s like telling the police they have to be at every stop sign in a city, and the city has a thousand stop signs.

People like you play right in the NYTimes hands. They are laughing at you.


555 posted on 04/12/2010 6:47:13 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson