Fuscone, in 1991. How did things go so wrong for this tan man?
Posted on 04/10/2010 2:13:56 PM PDT by dennisw
One of the freakiest — maybe the freakiest — things about this recession is how it has revealed the extent to which everyone in this country has been living beyond their means, even the people that you would least expect to be. Last year, it was reported that Goldman Sachs was bailing out employees who had overspent in the overheated market. And this Wednesday, Richard Fuscone, a former top executive at Merrill Lynch who retired to "pursue personal and charitable interests" in 2000, declared personal bankruptcy in order to stop the foreclosure of his 18,471-square-foot, eleven-bathroom Westchester mansion. "I have been devastated by the financial crisis which came to a head in March 2008," Fuscone wrote in his bankruptcy filing, which was obtained by Daily Intel. "I currently have no income."
We aren't quite sure what led him to this point, but from what we've found, it's shaping up to be a weird little story.
Fuscone, who has an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago and attended Harvard Business School, had a brush with the law in the early nineties — he was accused, along with other executives at Merrill, of securities fraud, for selling Orange County, California risky derivatives that caused it to go bankrupt. But he went on to become a shining star at Merrill, and eventually worked his way through the ranks to become their head of Latin America.
"Mr. Fuscone's group has consistently developed innovative products that are attractive to corporate sellers and investor buyers," wrote Crain's, which included him in their "40 Under 40" list in 1991, adding that Fuscone was "viewed by company insiders as a winner." Upon his retirement, then-CEO David Komansky praised him for his "business savvy, leadership skills, sound judgment and personal integrity."
Fuscone was also active philanthropically. Just five years ago was being feted for making a major donation to the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation. He even started an investment-advisory firm, Dover Management, specifically to take positions in ethical companies. Ethical companies, however, did not make the kind of money that could keep Fuscone in the lifestyle to which he had become accustomed, so he eventually joined Greenwich securities firm Weeden & Company as the managing director of their fixed-income division.
It's unclear when that position ended: The person who answered the phone at Weeden & Company confirmed to Daily Intel that Fuscone no longer worked there, but wouldn't comment further and hung up when pressed.
Clearly, something went very wrong. This past summer, Fuscone and his wife, Marjorie, were forced to sell their 5.5-bath home in Palm Beach, which they'd purchased in 2003 for $4.85 million, for $4.61 million, following a foreclosure action by Northern Trust Bank.
Soon after, in November, the Fuscones listed their Armonk, NY, mansion for $13.9 million, in hopes of avoiding foreclosure. But no one, apparently, was in the market for a mansion with two swimming pools, two elevators, six fireplaces, eleven bathrooms, and a seven-car garage, forcing the Fuscones to declare bankruptcy just to stop their lender, Houston-based Patriot Bank, from foreclosing and keep a roof — or, from looks of the picture, roofs — over their heads.
Also on Fuscone's list of creditors owed: Mercedes, Saks, and J. Crew.
Fuscone, in 1991. How did things go so wrong for this tan man?
Raise his taxes
Things didn’t go wrong for him. He still has a $14,000,000 house. Things went wrong for the creditors this crook owes.
“Things went wrong for the creditors this crook owes.”
It’s OK. He’s from Harvard Business School, he’s a professional.
a professional what ?
Don’t matter. just hang him.
“a professional what ?”
I sincerely hope that in the near future he will be a professional jailbird.
Is it just me or have a large number of Wall Street crooks been graduates of Harvard Business School?
Look, there is NOTHING “criminal” about bankruptcy.
The fact is, our country would have been MUCH better off if a number of firms, and individuals, had gone to bankruptcy court rather than looking for government bailouts.
EVERY lender knows that the threat of default, or bankruptcy, is out there, when ever they loan money.
Money is borrowed, and money is loaned out, on cash flow assumptions that can evaporate overnight, especially in a bad economy.
I think those who have posted here, calling this guy a “crook” or “criminal” without more facts, are really missing the mark.
Economic failure is NOT criminal.
A free society allows failure.
Bankruptcy is a good thing, if used properly.
Do you honestly think this f-—er doesn’t have off shore assets somewhere? Please. If he has no income, how the hell is going to pay the property tax or heat it. He should be kicked out of that house and into the street. Debtor prisons need to make a comeback.
“bankruptcy is a good thing”
for the original providor of goods, sevices, capital, ....well..........not so much.
Not all of us live beyond our means, but that doesnt stop the government from punishing us by making us pay the bills for those that do.
If he has no income how will he pay the property tax? I imagine property taxes in Westchester are higher than a cat's back. So, won't the county wind up with it?
Small fiddle....very small fiddle! As a matter of fact get a rope. Derivative trading is a big part of what got us into this mess.
Bankruptcy can take a year or more so he gets to live in the house meanwhile.... But will lose it eventually
I’ve never figured out why folks wouldn’t pay off their primary residence when they’ve got massive volumes of cash coming in. I get it, it’s a tax write off...it’s also stupid to believe that just because you made X millions last year, you’ll make X millions again next year.
Excellent and perfectly sane. The Monday Morning Economists on FR are a shame on the Conservative Movement.
Hippies watch their belly buttons. That’s why their so ignorant.
What excuse do FReepers have?
There is something criminal about filing bankruptcy with a 14M$ house. Sell the friggin thing and pay your bills.
Your “Monday Morning Economists” were warning about the suede shoed, “natural tan”, speculator gigilos like this yay-hoo, for years. And they were of course being mocked by the legions of get rich quickers.
Now you call them “Monday Morning Economists”?
I think not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.