[verity]

Have you noticed my tag line?

If Lafkin refuses to deploy, he can be tried by Courts Martial. Such a proceeding is not subject to the “Court of Public Opinion.”

In fact, if I were still on Active Duty and selected to be a member of the court and the defense had nothing to offer to refute Lafkin’s violation of the UCMJ, my secret written ballot would contain the word "Guilty."

[BP2]

In fact, if I were still on Active Duty and selected to be a member of the court and the defense had nothing to offer to refute Lafkin’s violation of the UCMJ, my secret written ballot would contain the word “Guilty.”

And you’d be CORRECT in your verdict, thereby giving him Injury and allowing his attorney to file for a quo warranto hearing in Federal Court.

You’d actually be helping Lt Col Lakin and serving your nation with honor.

LOL. You still don't get what this is really all about, do you?

Go back and read Post 493, as it may answer some of your questions.

IF you’re a Lib in Conservative's clothing — and there’s a LOT of that in this thread — it will undoubtedly drive you BONKERS seeing a comparison drawn between Lt Col Lakin's case and Rosa Parks.

[bushpilot1]

Who the heck is Lafkin? Doubt you were one of LTC Lakin’s peers.