Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brooksley Born Excoriates Alan Greenspan: “You Failed”
FDL News Desk ^ | Wednesday April 7, 2010 | David Dayen

Posted on 04/07/2010 5:53:20 PM PDT by dangthis

"At today’s Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission hearing, Brooksley Born, the former head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, declared Alan Greenspan’s tenure at the Federal Reserve an unmitigated failure – to his face. Greenspan accords a certain degree of respect on Capitol Hill, despite Born’s accurate take on his many failures, and so this outburst was highly unusual – and gratifying.

Born, who pushed to strictly regulate derivatives under the Clinton Administration, but lost the battle to, among other people, Alan Greenspan, told the former Federal Reserve chair that his agency “failed to prevent housing bubble, failed to prevent the predatory lending scandal, failed to prevent the activities that would bring the financial system to the verge of collapse.”

“You failed to prevent many of our banks from consolidating and growing to a size that are now too big or too interconnected to fail,” Born added. She added that Greenspan’s views on deregulation, which he took as an article of faith, contributed to the Federal Reserve’s failure in delivering on its mandate."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.firedoglake.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bankfailure; brooksleyborn; derivatives; greenspan; miserablefailure
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last
Frontline showed all this last year. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/warning/view/

I can't believe Greenspan attempted to white wash this.

1 posted on 04/07/2010 5:53:21 PM PDT by dangthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dangthis
Greenspan tried to whitewash what?
2 posted on 04/07/2010 5:58:20 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangthis
Government itself, especially Barney Frank, were more to blame than Alan Greenspan, who did not make government policy, so Brookly Born, whoever the hell she is, needs to point the finger at the people who are paying her failed Commission to attack Greenspan and others after the disaster. How easy it is to call a man a "failure" when you have the luxury of looking back at history. And how arrogant. I'm no Greenspan fan, but this Born person is an idiot.
3 posted on 04/07/2010 6:01:18 PM PDT by jiminycricket000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangthis
I can't believe Greenspan attempted to white wash this.

Remember who he's married to.....a profession whitewasher.

4 posted on 04/07/2010 6:01:41 PM PDT by ErnBatavia (It's not the Obama Administration....it's the "Obama Regime".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangthis
Brooksley Born

"..Born was particularly concerned about swaps, financial instruments that are traded over the counter between banks, insurance companies or other funds or companies, and thus have no transparency except to the two counterparties and the counterparties' regulators, if any. CFTC regulation was strenuously opposed by Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan, Treasury Secretaries Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers.[4] On May 7, 1998, former SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt joined Rubin and Greenspan in objecting to the issuance of the CFTC’s concept release. Their response dismissed Born's concerns off-hand and focused on the possibility that CFTC regulation of swaps and other OTC derivative instruments would increase legal uncertainty of such instruments, potentially creating turmoil in the markets, and reducing the value of the instruments. Further concerns voiced were that the imposition of new regulatory costs would stifle innovation and push transactions offshore.[7].."

Credit Default Swaps were huge in the meltdown.

5 posted on 04/07/2010 6:02:22 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangthis

CONGRESS FAILED.


6 posted on 04/07/2010 6:06:37 PM PDT by Freddd (CNN is down to Three Hundred Thousand viewers. But they worked for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangthis

Anyone who marries Andrea Mitchell is a failure.


7 posted on 04/07/2010 6:11:44 PM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangthis

Greenspan left the Fed at the beginning of 2006. He is the favorite scapegoat of the Democrats because he advocated deregulation. The current financial mess is not a result of deregulation, but of government meddling in the economy. The Democrats want an excuse to meddle even more, hence their toadies are attacking anyone that they can brand as market oriented. Greenspan was not omniscient, and there is a limit to how much the Fed chairman can do to compensate for the fraud and thievery committed by the Democrat gang.


8 posted on 04/07/2010 6:20:17 PM PDT by Ragnar54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

He pretended that he did not stand in the way of regulating the over the counter derivatives market when it was first suggested. In fact he killed it during the Clinton administration. He attempted to rewrite history. Trust me on this story. Greenspan just put blood in the water today. The true story of what happened will continue to come out. It was the over the counter derivatives that gave Freddie Mac & Fannie Mae their power.


9 posted on 04/07/2010 7:08:32 PM PDT by dangthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jiminycricket000

Try history, facts, and honesty for useful characteristics when forming an opinion.

“Government itself, especially Barney Frank, were more to blame than Alan Greenspan”

You can be brought along for the ride.


10 posted on 04/07/2010 7:08:33 PM PDT by dangthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Freddd

“CONGRESS FAILED.”

It failed during the Clinton Administration first. That was that moment in history when the mold was cast to bring everything down. The warning was clear, published in fact, and the congress created a bill that killed regulation once and for all ack then. In fact it’s still the law today. Don’t you find it funny that Chris Dodd and Barney Frank went around blaming the Republicans for not regulating it? I find that very funny. That takes a real set of them to hang their own failings on the opposition. But that’s typical.


11 posted on 04/07/2010 7:08:33 PM PDT by dangthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ragnar54

Sorry but you are just following a party line opinion from somewhere.

“The current financial mess is not a result of deregulation, but of government meddling in the economy.”

No, that’s the red herring.

It’s the over the counter derivatives and the housing bubble. The derivative trading allowed the creation of tradeable financial instruments that held mortgages in split risk forms of speculative market trading. Everyone was getting rich off the rising values of speculative real estate ownership. While it was going up it was OK. As soon as there were more properties for sale than buyers to buy them then the balloon burst. It always happens that way. All you have to do is to honestly look at the history of the housing market. BTW, I got the Greenspan memo that the housing bubble was about to burst. I knew there was going to be a collapse back in 2005. I’m a builder. I know things.


12 posted on 04/07/2010 7:08:33 PM PDT by dangthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dangthis
It was the over the counter derivatives that gave Freddie Mac & Fannie Mae their power.

Please elaborate.

13 posted on 04/07/2010 7:14:50 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Greenspan tried to whitewash what?

Watch the Frontline piece. I guarantee it will be worth your time and bandwidth.

14 posted on 04/07/2010 7:47:08 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

No. If you can’t summarize it, then I assure you it will be not.


15 posted on 04/07/2010 7:48:50 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

You’re just lazy and want to be spoon-fed then.


16 posted on 04/07/2010 8:11:50 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

“Please elaborate.”

“The derivative market was the bottom line that gave the government enterprises the capability to sell off the bad loans after they purchased them from the banks. It’s really a funny kind of Ponzi scheme. They put blinders on the watchdogs and then went into business selling bad paper. All it took was a breathing bag of skin that could successfully sign a loan application. If dogs and cats could have signed the loans they would have done that too. If they could not have transfered those bad loans somewhere then they could not have screwed us. But they had that covered. They made a law preventing any government agency from monitoring that market. That was a Clinton administration & congress that did that. Remember how home ownership was the big achievement? You have to love our government when it does what it does the best. It took suckers to take out the loans and lending institutions like the two government enterprises to create this freight train disaster.”

The regulation that caused this was making sure that the over the counter derivatives market remained in the dark. As long as a house could be purchased and then sold six months to a year later everyone was riding that gravy train.

If you dump a truck full of gold nuggets in a stream and then tell anyone that could crawl that they only needed to go down and jump in then guess what happens. It was a Ponzi Scheme. The government makes Bernie Madoff look like a saint compared to this.

Just look at those jack asses telling the world it was because of deregulation. It was their deregulation and Greenspan just met his own Waterloo.


17 posted on 04/07/2010 8:14:58 PM PDT by dangthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dangthis
Yes, there was a housing bubble and yes it burst. And yes that always happens.

This time, the bubble was artificially prolonged by the government mandating loans that should not have been made and by massive fraud at Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac. Financial instruments based on the assumed value of the fraudulent loans were of course overvalued. The risk associated with the loans was underestimated.

Additional damage was done by the selective "bailout" (courtesy of the taxpayer) of some favored financial institutions. In addition to the initial cost to the taxpayer, keeping such institutions (e.g., Fannie and Freddie) alive will only perpetuate the problem. Further, the massive bailouts were used as justification for the obscene "stimulus" packages.

The current attack on Greenspan by Obama's minions is just part of the overall assault on capitalism by the communist in chief. Greenspan was the most recent Fed chairman with no Obama connection (Obama renominated Bernanke, so Bernanke can't be at fault!). The solutions proposed by the neo-communist (Democrat) party always involve more government control, so of course enemies of the state will be demonized for daring to suggest any sort of market solution to a problem.
18 posted on 04/07/2010 9:00:28 PM PDT by Ragnar54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ragnar54

Frankly, this particular capitalist needs castigation. This is where the overblown Libertarian economic nonsense meets the real world. The government isn’t the source of all of our problems. Sometimes it’s us.

The world isn’t that simplistic. Ayn Rand’s heroic kids playing pirates is a fun fantasy. When it leaves the bedroom, though, it ceases to be cute. You might want to try this on. This is a real good site for separating the truth from the myths. Another good one is the Market Ticker.

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2010/03/debunking-michael-lewis-subprime-short-hagiography.html

parsy, who wishes things really were that simple


19 posted on 04/07/2010 9:08:19 PM PDT by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: parsifal

Greenspan, as head of the government central bank Fed, was not acting like a “capitalist.” He was acting like a politician and motivate by political considerations.


20 posted on 04/07/2010 9:10:08 PM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson