Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yes, Palin is Loyal, but to What and to Whom?
NewsReal ^ | 2010-04-07 | John R. Guardiano

Posted on 04/07/2010 1:32:58 PM PDT by rabscuttle385

Conflicting loyalties seem to have resulted in some surprising political decisions by Sarah Palin.

On Monday here at NewsReal Blog I argued that Govenor Sarah Palin’s active support of John McCain’s Senate reelection campaign makes no sense. Palin, after all, doesn’t owe McCain anything. Whatever debt she might have owed McCain she paid off during the 2008 presidential campaign.

In fact, if anything, it seems to me that McCain is indebted to Palin. This because his ‘08 campaign really did her a disservice, and also because McCain staffers have since betrayed the former Alaska governor with malicious and disparaging leaks to the media.

Many of the commenters to my post don’t disagree. However, they write, there is one laudable reason why Palin is actively supporting McCain: loyalty.

Fair enough. Loyalty is important. But it seems to me that Palin has competing loyalty obligations; and that she chose to be loyal to McCain when she just as easily could have chosen to be loyal to other people and other principles instead.

For example, Palin knows that some of her most steadfast supporters in the conservative and Tea Party movements have very profound and important differences with McCain.

These Palin supporters believe that on too many critical issues — including free speech (aka “campaign finance reform”), military modernization, and illegal immigration – McCain is a liberal wolf in a conservative sheep’s clothing.

What about loyalty to these people? What about loyalty to their issues and concerns? Why does loyalty to one man, one politician, outweigh loyalty to millions of dedicated conservative and Tea Party activists?

And why does personal loyalty to a man (McCain) outweigh loyalty to a set of conservative political principles?

No one’s saying that Palin had to actively oppose McCain. That might, indeed, have been awkward and ill-advised given that she was his vice presidential running mate.

But why did Palin have to go out of her way to actively support and campaign for McCain? Why couldn’t she have praised both McCain and his challenger, Rep. J.D. Hayworth, while remaining neutral in the Arizona Senate race?

I can think of two possible explanations offered up, respectively, by journalists Conor Friedersdorf and Matthew Continetti.

Friedersdorf says that Palin simply may not be the conservative her steadfast supporters think she is. She may, in fact, be a John McCain Republican. This would mean that she is liberal on some issues, moderate on others, and conservative about a few things.

Continetti notes that since being thrust into the national limelight, Palin has “become incredibly rich.” It may be — and this is me speaking, not Continetti — that because of her newfound riches, Palin feels an understandable debt, literally and figuratively, to Sen. McCain.

If true, that’s fine. Making money to support one’s family is honorable. But that’s a different type of loyalty, I think, than many of the governor’s defenders have in mind.

John R. Guardiano is a writer and analyst in Arlington, Virginia. You can follow him on Twitter: @Guardian0.


TOPICS: Editorial; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: az2010; derangedpalinistas; loyalty; mccain; mccainiacs; mclamesrinoparty; palin; palin4mccain; palin4rinos; palinhate; palinsrinocircus; paulestinians; pds; rinoapologistsarah; rinos4palin; sarahmcpalin; sarahpalin; scorpions4mccain; trashingsarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 581-597 next last
To: ohioWfan

I thought for sure someone would post a LIVE thread. :(
I was talking with eldest son on the phone. Priorites, ya know.


341 posted on 04/07/2010 6:23:44 PM PDT by onyx (Facts don't matter. Proof not required. Anything goes! Racial slurs, death threats.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol
LOL! Yes. Sarah and Michelle.

Facts at their fingertips, articulate, quick witted, and RIGHT.

Wouldn't you love to see a debate between Sarah and Michelle and Barack and Joe?

Humiliation for the bad guys! It would be ssswwweeeeet!

342 posted on 04/07/2010 6:24:05 PM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

everyone knows what JD Hayworth is like; except Joe Arpaio because he is just like him.


343 posted on 04/07/2010 6:25:45 PM PDT by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
It comes from experience and holding onto traditional beliefs that were universal until the 1960s.

Perception and your family's experience is nice but in the 1950s, about 26% of married women with kids worked, including my mother, probably non of us had stay at home dads though.

I wonder how far you will go to stop your wife from being President of the United States and leader of the conservative movement if it ever becomes a real possibility.

344 posted on 04/07/2010 6:25:49 PM PDT by ansel12 ( Why are the non "social conservative" Republicans so unconservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: sabe@q.com

So Sheriff Joe is a bad guy because he enforces the law?


345 posted on 04/07/2010 6:26:26 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper ("Ked Tennedy would have been plowed... I mean, proud today..." - Senator Max Baucus (Drunk-MT))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

Link please.


346 posted on 04/07/2010 6:26:30 PM PDT by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I shouldn’t have included my mother along with the marrieds, she was divorced.


347 posted on 04/07/2010 6:27:01 PM PDT by ansel12 ( Why are the non "social conservative" Republicans so unconservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

That’s what I’m afraid: of the tens of thousands of nervous nellies in AZ will reject Hayworth and stick with their painful McPain.


348 posted on 04/07/2010 6:27:20 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

He enforces laws which don’t exist.


349 posted on 04/07/2010 6:27:35 PM PDT by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
He supported Obamacare before voting against it.

Yep, that's why he never got out there and campaigned against it until the very last minute when it was sure to pass. He's supposed to be fighting Obama, standing up for us, yet he spends all his time in Arizona fighting JD. He always has been useless.

350 posted on 04/07/2010 6:32:36 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: sabe@q.com

LOL. Oh.


351 posted on 04/07/2010 6:34:41 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper ("Ked Tennedy would have been plowed... I mean, proud today..." - Senator Max Baucus (Drunk-MT))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: sabe@q.com
everyone knows what JD Hayworth is like; except Joe Arpaio because he is just like him.

You may not realize this, because you seem pretty oblivious to just about everything in Arizona, but Joe is just about the most popular politician in the state. He is the ONLY one out there doing the job we hired him to do. He's the ONLY one enforcing the law as it was written. So great, if JD is like Sherrif Joe, then that's one more reason to vote for him.

352 posted on 04/07/2010 6:34:58 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

Google the legal problems Arpaio has.


353 posted on 04/07/2010 6:37:54 PM PDT by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

You’re from out of state.


354 posted on 04/07/2010 6:38:19 PM PDT by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: heye2monn
"The kids are fragile and needy. They crave the love of a parent rather than a 17 year old hired hand, and don’t care one whit whether Mom is a Congresswoman."

Sarah Palin is not a Congresswoman. What planet are you on?

Something is wrong when someone wants to bring Sarah's family situation into criticism. What is your problem?

355 posted on 04/07/2010 6:38:45 PM PDT by jonrick46 (We're being water boarded with the sewage of Fabian Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
Nice finesse, but that doesn't explain why she would allow a so-called "RINO" (Palin) anywhere near her present campaign. Seems that would paint Bachmann as a "RINO" as well.

That begs the question: Is Bachmann a) a "RINO" or b) stupid? Either way, by your definition, Bachmann is not qualified to hold office.

356 posted on 04/07/2010 6:39:09 PM PDT by LaybackLenny (Palin-Bachmann Overdrive 2012 - takin' care o' business!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: sabe@q.com
I'm quite aware of the legal problems he has, they are manufactured by people who have a vested interest in keeping illegals working (you know, taking those jobs away from Americans, after all Arizona only has 17% unemployment, wouldn't want that to go down would we?)

You seem very naive, how old are you, 15? 17? You couldn't possibly be an adult and be that oblivious to just about everything that is going on. You mean to tell me that you can't see a witch hunt when you see one?

357 posted on 04/07/2010 6:40:35 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

Including the federal grand jury who have subpoenaed witnesses cuz Sheriff Joe sent deputies to Maricopa County employees homes to harass them?


358 posted on 04/07/2010 6:43:05 PM PDT by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies]

To: sabe@q.com

Oh please! A prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich if he tells the grand jury to do it. Everyone knows that. He went after corruption, but I guess you don’t want corruption stopped. They are really going after Joe because he’s going after illegals. Too many people like having those under the table employees. Hire them for a job, promise them $14.00 an hour and when it comes time to pay them give them $100.00 and tell them if they don’t like it you’ll turn them in. Those are the people who are pushing this.


359 posted on 04/07/2010 6:47:20 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: sabe@q.com
You’re from out of state.

Yeah, So?  I got a brother who lives in Phoenix.

360 posted on 04/07/2010 6:47:55 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper ("Ked Tennedy would have been plowed... I mean, proud today..." - Senator Max Baucus (Drunk-MT))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 581-597 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson