Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yes, Palin is Loyal, but to What and to Whom?
NewsReal ^ | 2010-04-07 | John R. Guardiano

Posted on 04/07/2010 1:32:58 PM PDT by rabscuttle385

Conflicting loyalties seem to have resulted in some surprising political decisions by Sarah Palin.

On Monday here at NewsReal Blog I argued that Govenor Sarah Palin’s active support of John McCain’s Senate reelection campaign makes no sense. Palin, after all, doesn’t owe McCain anything. Whatever debt she might have owed McCain she paid off during the 2008 presidential campaign.

In fact, if anything, it seems to me that McCain is indebted to Palin. This because his ‘08 campaign really did her a disservice, and also because McCain staffers have since betrayed the former Alaska governor with malicious and disparaging leaks to the media.

Many of the commenters to my post don’t disagree. However, they write, there is one laudable reason why Palin is actively supporting McCain: loyalty.

Fair enough. Loyalty is important. But it seems to me that Palin has competing loyalty obligations; and that she chose to be loyal to McCain when she just as easily could have chosen to be loyal to other people and other principles instead.

For example, Palin knows that some of her most steadfast supporters in the conservative and Tea Party movements have very profound and important differences with McCain.

These Palin supporters believe that on too many critical issues — including free speech (aka “campaign finance reform”), military modernization, and illegal immigration – McCain is a liberal wolf in a conservative sheep’s clothing.

What about loyalty to these people? What about loyalty to their issues and concerns? Why does loyalty to one man, one politician, outweigh loyalty to millions of dedicated conservative and Tea Party activists?

And why does personal loyalty to a man (McCain) outweigh loyalty to a set of conservative political principles?

No one’s saying that Palin had to actively oppose McCain. That might, indeed, have been awkward and ill-advised given that she was his vice presidential running mate.

But why did Palin have to go out of her way to actively support and campaign for McCain? Why couldn’t she have praised both McCain and his challenger, Rep. J.D. Hayworth, while remaining neutral in the Arizona Senate race?

I can think of two possible explanations offered up, respectively, by journalists Conor Friedersdorf and Matthew Continetti.

Friedersdorf says that Palin simply may not be the conservative her steadfast supporters think she is. She may, in fact, be a John McCain Republican. This would mean that she is liberal on some issues, moderate on others, and conservative about a few things.

Continetti notes that since being thrust into the national limelight, Palin has “become incredibly rich.” It may be — and this is me speaking, not Continetti — that because of her newfound riches, Palin feels an understandable debt, literally and figuratively, to Sen. McCain.

If true, that’s fine. Making money to support one’s family is honorable. But that’s a different type of loyalty, I think, than many of the governor’s defenders have in mind.

John R. Guardiano is a writer and analyst in Arlington, Virginia. You can follow him on Twitter: @Guardian0.


TOPICS: Editorial; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: az2010; derangedpalinistas; loyalty; mccain; mccainiacs; mclamesrinoparty; palin; palin4mccain; palin4rinos; palinhate; palinsrinocircus; paulestinians; pds; rinoapologistsarah; rinos4palin; sarahmcpalin; sarahpalin; scorpions4mccain; trashingsarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 581-597 next last
To: rmlew

How strict is your religion when it comes to women, does your wife sit next to you in services?


301 posted on 04/07/2010 5:36:03 PM PDT by ansel12 ( Why are the non "social conservative" Republicans so unconservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Maybe McCain made a mistake in supporting TARP. But Pres Obama misrepresented how TARP would benefit the Country. A lot of republicans voted for it because a lot of us thought it would great for the Country.

Can’t blame it on McCain; its time to rid Pres. Obama for mishandling it.


302 posted on 04/07/2010 5:36:32 PM PDT by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
There is a fundamental difference between disagreeing with certain policies of a patriotic leader who defends our lives, while supporting him overall (like Bush), and wholeheartedly supporting a candidate who isn't sane and doesn't care if we all die (like Paul).

Yep...but if you're not sane yourself, you won't see it :^D

303 posted on 04/07/2010 5:37:28 PM PDT by CAluvdubya (We need a Commander-in-Chief, not a professor of Law standing at a lectern-Palin 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: Spok
Palin’s support of McCain does not make her a RINO; it just makes her loyal.

It makes her loyal to someone who has no loyalty to conservatism. That is the very type of thinking that caused the OP(formerly the GOP) to move towards the socialist left over many years.
304 posted on 04/07/2010 5:37:53 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

They surely did, and for all we can tell, much more than Obama.

Anyhow, when a family like Sarah’s and Todd’s gets to move into the White House (Todd would be First Laddie if Sarah were president) that’s where they live. With the kids. Servants are no problem. Baby sitters are no problem. Food shopping is not a problem. There would be lots of time for both parents with the children, understanding that Sarah might be called off for an emergency at any time. The kids can all go on Air Force One when Sarah travels; it’s big enough. I just don’t see the presidency as a serious risk to her family.


305 posted on 04/07/2010 5:38:44 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya

GOOD point! ;*)


306 posted on 04/07/2010 5:40:42 PM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Spok
Your tagline is interesting! "Free Range Republican" -- !

Because of the support of the Tea Party, she is despised by the RINO’s almost as much as by the left.

Just talked to folks who went to Searchlight to see Palin. They said:
1. Lots and lots and lots of young people, 30 and younger.
2. Lots of people -- more than 10,000.
3. People of all colors and political stripes, from self-proclaimed liberals to self-proclaimed independents and beyond. It's a new Rebel's Brew.
4. Visit to the site next day found ZERO evidence that thousands had been there the day before.
5. She's an excellent speaker.

307 posted on 04/07/2010 5:43:12 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil; LaybackLenny

I hadn’t heard that about her boasting about being back at work so soon. Too bad. Sure hope Dad stays home.

The kids are fragile and needy. They crave the love of a parent rather than a 17 year old hired hand, and don’t care one whit whether Mom is a Congresswoman.


308 posted on 04/07/2010 5:44:50 PM PDT by heye2monn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: LaybackLenny

“Question: Do you consider Michele Bachmann a RINO?”

NO

“Considering she supported McCain for President in 2008”

McCain was running against a life long Communist.


309 posted on 04/07/2010 5:48:30 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Excellent post.


310 posted on 04/07/2010 5:49:00 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior
...put a windfall profits tax on oil companies in Alaska...

Right. A tax that isn't on profits and isn't on windfalls, but you call it a "windfall profits tax" anyway. The tactic is faintly along the lines of calling reduced rates of increase "cuts."

Man. If you're going to challenge Palin, do it with honest material.

311 posted on 04/07/2010 5:55:17 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody; rabscuttle385; stockpirate; Responsibility2nd; rmlew; PSYCHO-FREEP; UCFRoadWarrior; ...
No matter why she resigned the governorship of Alaska, it proves to me she isn’t up to the Presidency.

Obviously you are not familiar with the issue.

Let’s clear something up right now.

It’s been suggested that Gov. Palin “chose” to use her personal counsel to defend herself instead of using the Attorney General or the Department of Law, and therefore it’s her own fault that she has accumulated over half a million dollars in legal debt.

That is complete balderdash.

The governor cannot use the AG to defend herself against ethics complaints. The AG is responsible for prosecuting violations of the law. But in the case of the governor and ethics complaints, the AG is removed from doing so by the law, and an independent counsel (or investigator) is contracted by the Personnel Board to act in place of the AG:

In any case, Palin has crossed the Rubicon and made her stand clear. She gave us a hint before when she said "Politically, if I die, I die." I think this was her equivalent of alea iacta est. She will now be the anti-Obama, standing up for her personal beliefs, free of the constraints the Alaskan people have placed on her. She is now free of them, and they of her - though I think they will be the ones to regret it first.

Yes I miss her greatly. She has done more to slay the kill America administration, than anyone else out there. Yet, the Sarah trolls here in FR line up like rabid dogs - maybe they're happy with Oloser instead, Perhaps they'll ping me when they find the perfect candidate? Maybe, if some of them keep pounding the drum long enough, Jim Rob will find a room for the Palin Hate mongers, like Rabscuttle?
312 posted on 04/07/2010 5:56:28 PM PDT by Issaquahking (Help Sarah Palin! go to - http://www.conservatives4palin.com - You know what to do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sabe@q.com
Well, I've lived in Arizona for over 65 years and I never saw what you are talking about. So what if he was a sports caster, it's not like he was on the take from some construction executive like Charles Keating. Sports casting is an honorable profession.

What do you have against the indians? Are you some kind of bigot? You live in Arizona and yet you resent the indians getting any of the tax money back that this state sends to Washington? How about the fact that McCain thinks we should send money to Washington but should never get a dime of it back. That's what a politician is supposed to do, get OUR share back. Taxes shouldn't be a one way street.

313 posted on 04/07/2010 5:56:29 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: heye2monn
Sure hope Dad stays home.

Todd Palin is a stay at home dad through this period, he left his oil company job.

You could save yourself having to pass out so many holier than thou insults against Palin if you would look into it a little before making your snooty posts.

314 posted on 04/07/2010 5:57:34 PM PDT by ansel12 ( Why are the non "social conservative" Republicans so unconservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: sabe@q.com
And Hayworth comes across as a know-it-all windbag. I don’t need politicians like that telling me what to do; even if they are a member of my party.

Really? How about a know it all windbag who tells a woman who's husband was MIA in Viet Nam "Your husband's dead, get over it". Do you appreciate that kind of politician? Obviously you do since you support McCain. That woman was a friend of mine.

315 posted on 04/07/2010 5:58:39 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

Did you even read my post at all?


316 posted on 04/07/2010 5:59:34 PM PDT by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

I just saw that you are a bachelor so you really don’t have a dog in this hunt, it is only theory to you.

Just how strict is your religion against women?


317 posted on 04/07/2010 6:00:34 PM PDT by ansel12 ( Why are the non "social conservative" Republicans so unconservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: sabe@q.com

Yes, I did.


318 posted on 04/07/2010 6:01:22 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya

Sarah Palin and Bachmann on Hannity now


319 posted on 04/07/2010 6:02:03 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck; rmlew

Palin has refused her servants in the past, she did not desire their services.


320 posted on 04/07/2010 6:02:35 PM PDT by ansel12 ( Why are the non "social conservative" Republicans so unconservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 581-597 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson