To: kristinn
I think this kind of thing has happened before.
46 posted on
04/07/2010 7:51:24 AM PDT by
toast
To: toast
Fallacy. These men, who are named in the wanted posters, were convicted in a court of law -- either in absentia, or in person (and then escaped).
But thanks for playin'.
58 posted on
04/07/2010 7:59:25 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
("We beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
To: toast
Not really. Every single one of those wanted posters had to be approved by a judge. The perpetrator had already been tried “in absentia”. There were and are specific laws covering that. Anwar Al-Waliki has already said through his family that he is not supporting terrorism. He does not come forward because he fears that he would not receive a fair trial. There is “reasonable doubt” of whether he is guilty or not.
67 posted on
04/07/2010 8:13:24 AM PDT by
wbarmy
(I decided to be a sheepdog when I saw what happens to sheep.)
To: toast
Remind me again which President it was that ordered the assassination of those men.
150 posted on
04/07/2010 9:17:29 AM PDT by
Hoodat
(For the weapons of our warfare are mighty in God for pulling down strongholds.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson