Posted on 04/05/2010 3:13:26 PM PDT by wagglebee
Ah ha, I was right. There's the Paul connection. Something in the back of my mind kept hinting at it. Probably from the 2008 election debates here...
You are an anarchist. It’s here for all to see, in your own words.
Your denying it fools no one but yourself.
The life of the flesh is in the blood and there is no blood flowing at conception and God was fully aware of that when He had it written.
Well, if you look at the link on Hanks FR homepage, it links to his “Independent Individualist” page where he proudly has an Alex Jones video:
http://usabig.com/atnmst/jrnl_ii.php?art=49
The video is not too bad. I don’t care at all for Alex Jones, but one of the Christian authors I publish sent me the link asking me to post it. So I did.
By the way, at least four of the authors I publish every week are Christians.
http://usabig.com/iindv/jrnl.php
Hank
For claiming to be atheist, Hank sure knows Scripture well enough to try to bludgeon believers into submission to his viewpoint with it.
That's pretty typical of atheists. They think that just cause they whip out Scripture and (mis)quote a few Bible verses at believers, that all of a sudden believers are going to go into a tailspin thinking that God disapproves of what the atheist thinks is *unChristian* behavior, and back off or roll over and expose their jugular.
Atheists think of and use Scripture like some kind of mind control device over Christians. We're not as ignorant of Scripture and their atheistic tactics as they think we are.
It's funny... So many atheists accuse Christians of hypocrisy, and yet turn around and appeal to the Bible and God that they reject in a bid to try to win a debate they're losing.
Talk about hypocritical. They need to argue their own position on its own merits if they think that atheist is so rational.
No, but it highlights what I'm going to address in my response...
You are picking and choosing what parts of the Bible you want to uphold and act on, it is as simple as that.
Just following your lead...
Again, Adam wasn't a living soul until he breathed and the Bible says that the life of the flesh is in the blood, and blood isn't flowing in the first month or so.
Adam's birth was completely different from conception as we know it. "Gen 2:7 then the LORD God formed the man of dust from the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living creature." See what I mean by following your lead...? Not a proper example of what we're discussing; the gift of life given to a woman by God, and which encompasses an entirely different process.
You want to kill fetuses, go ahead. It's you who will answer for it, not me.
I dread writing this, but I must respectfully disagree. I believe that every girl or woman should always be given the opportunity to terminate a very early stage pregnancy resulting from incest or rape.
Humans lost the ability to govern themselves when they were given free will, and sin entered the World. As another poster put it, our form of government is based on Christian ideals and is the most decent, non-intrusive form yet developed (or up to now, anyway). Some form of government is necessary to counteract evil. And humans are by nature prone to evil. I know ol’ Hank will disagree as he doesn’t see himself as sinful, but there it is.
“You are an anarchist. It’s here for all to see, in your own words.
Your denying it fools no one but yourself.”
As I said before, I do not care who thinks that. Even if it were true, I don’t know why you’re getting panties in a wad over it. What do you care?
For anyone who would like to know the truth, I explain here:
http://usabig.com/atnmst/jrnl_ii.php?art=89
Hank
We already know the truth. We're not interested in your distortion of it. And the truth is, you're an atheist. Or some sort of deist. It has to be one or the other. You just won't admit it.
Just curious. Why are you so interested in me. I’m not interested in you. Don’t you have anything else to do?
Hank
I’m not a theist.= I am an atheist.
It’s simply a matter of where the negative in the sentence is put.
If you believe that there is no God, by definition, you are an *a*theist.
http://www.wordinfo.info/words/index/info/view_unit/2838
*a* meaning *non* in the Greek.
a-, an- +
(Greek: a prefix meaning: no, absence of, without, lack of, not)
These prefixes are normally used with elements of Greek origin, a- is used before consonants and an- is used before vowels.
It affects the meanings of hundreds of words.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atheist
Main Entry: athe·ist
Function: noun
Date: 1551
: one who believes that there is no deity
Why? By what civilized standard should a child be held responsible for the crimes of his or her father?
He’s the second person I’ve seen on FR in as many days who is promoting Alex Jones. Another evo/atheist was carrying on about how much Alex Jones was correct on.
Again you're mistaken. I'm not interested in you, just in correcting your misconceptions. And here you present another one...
As for other things to do, I do them while online, and I've also been tending a thread on how different usernames came to be. Rather entertaining...
Absolute according to WHOSE standards? Yours? That sounds pretty arbitrary to me.
What makes your ethics any more absolute than anyone else's?
Which troll is that?
Yep, as I pointed out above, Hank doesn’t understand what he’s saying. He says he’s no atheist. But that then means he’s a deist since atheist is the opposite of deist. Yet he says he doesn’t believe in God. I don’t think ol’ Hank really understands what his beliefs are...
Oh, and Hank, again this isn’t because I’m interested in you, but because I’m trying to clear up your inconsistencies. You talk in circles...
Getting a little warm in the kitchen?
You finally get pinned down about what you believe, and you start changing the subject.
It’s too late. You’ve been exposed and are no longer in a position to be able to deny what you believe without looking more like a total fool than you already are.
Not a pretty picture is it?
Someone... hmmm... I’m trying to think who...
quoted Scripture to try to get Christ to sin...
can’t remember who that was...
:)
The answer to someone who tries to use Scripture to silence believers
is MORE SCRIPTURE.
The verses they quote are out of context,
and the context is the ENTIRE BIBLE.
Know your Bible, and the overall CONSISTENT theme (and there are no inconsistencies),
and you’ll not be baffled by an out of context quote.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.