Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

We are facing two types of tyranny, the tyranny of economic confiscation of wealth/property and a more insidious personal one the one that wishes to control our very minds and consciences. When someone says they don't care about "social issues" they are just as dangerous or even more so than someone who would raise your taxes because they would just as quickly tax your very soul for your beliefs and personal judgments as long as their pocketbooks were fat.
1 posted on 04/05/2010 12:20:59 PM PDT by Maelstorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Maelstorm

“Such hoteliers are guilty of bad business as well as bad manners: they are harming their profits for no good reason”

I don’t know, it’s probably hard to get regular or repeat business from straight couples, families, and/or anybody treated to extreme homosexual behavior at a B&B.


2 posted on 04/05/2010 12:45:47 PM PDT by Persevero (Ask yourself: "What does the Left want me to do?" Then go do the opposite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maelstorm

Right. That’s why I can’t go with Libertarians. They profess to leave social issues such as gay marriage to the private sector without accounting for the vast body of civil law that assumes marriage to be an essentially procreative institution. By failing to recognize that long-standing, rational, biologically based assumption, many irrational and harmful consequences follow, such as the state-coerced assaults on conscience cited in the main article of this thread, under a pretext of “equal protection.”

But the worst losers of this departure from hormonal reality are the children. The Netherlands provides an example of what happens when the state leaves the definition of marriage to the whims of arbitrary societal factions rather than rooting it in the biology and psychology of creating new children. In the Netherlands, marriage is becoming an artifact of the past. New children are more and more the product of random relationships and increasingly dropped on the doorstep of the state, to be raised as good little statists themselves, winding the cycle of state dependency ever deeper into the collective psyche of the culture.

If I were to vote as Libertarians do on this issue, I would think myself a worker of cruelty to future generations of children, lost boys and girls, with no clear path back to the blessings of natural family life and their own, biologically grounded sexual identity.


3 posted on 04/05/2010 1:00:23 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maelstorm

With Hillary I learned the term “feigned anger” and now I’ve learned “Syntetic outrage”


7 posted on 04/05/2010 2:10:47 PM PDT by FreeManWhoCan (I like dogs better than I like most people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maelstorm

I guess I’m a homophobe because I’m utterly disgusted by gays.Fine by me!


10 posted on 04/05/2010 6:29:50 PM PDT by POWERSBOOTHEFAN (Blessed Be The Name Of The Lord,For His Name Alone Is Exaulted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson